6b10 fwiw

For reference, the 6b9 packaged in F-9 works, we don't have a 6b10 to confirm
that the difference is 6b10 vs 6b9 though

reassign

Svante, could you throw a look at that?

Thanks

    Kay

I will take a look at it, going to install me OpenJDK.

@Rene: 

Is it an option to upgrade Rhino to 1.7R1 (2008-03-06)
http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/download.html

Regards,
Svante (sus)

sus: yes, see also issue 55641.

Of course, it should still be buildable with both openjdk-6 and java-gcj-compat...

There are three Java compiling issues, I examined one:

org.mozilla.javascript.tools.debugger.FrameHelper is not abstract and does not
override abstract method onDebuggerStatement(org.mozilla.javascript.Context) in
org.mozilla.javascript.debug.DebugFrame

This is an Java compiling issue, which should be independent from JDK.
For me it works on JDK 6 under Windows, there I take a closer look into 

rhino/download/rhino1_5R5.zip

especially on
rhino1_5R5/src/org/mozilla/javascript/debug/DebugFrame.java

you will not find the interface method 
onDebuggerStatement(..)

Which is claimed to be implemented by
org.mozilla.javascript.tools.debugger.FrameHelper (BTW as well missing in my
XSLTFILTER10 version of rhino).

But you will find online a version, where this interface exists:
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/js/rhino/src/org/mozilla/javascript/debug/DebugFrame.java

Could it be that you are somehow working on newer rhino sources?

Regards,
Svante

BTW two pages of deprecation warnings and interfaces completely changed, classes
missing, all this seems to be some slight indication that it might be time to
update the library.

http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/download.html
Perhaps to Rhino 1.7R1?

Anything that blocks us in doing so?
Pretty sure it will solve your problem, Rene.

> Could it be that you are somehow working on newer rhino sources?

no. simple beta2 tarball.

Rene: Here is a hands on for you:

Take a look into 
rhino1_5R5/src/org/mozilla/javascript/debug/DebugFrame.java

If you find an interface method 
onDebuggerStatement(..)

Your rhino/download/rhino1_5R5.zip differs from mine.

Somewhere the compile HAVE to find this method, it works for me on CWS
XSLTFILTER10 and DEV300 m29.

.

> Your rhino/download/rhino1_5R5.zip differs from mine.

That cannot be, again: I use the rhino of the tree. really.
$ md5sum rhino1_5R5.zip 
798b2ffdc8bcfe7bca2cf92b62caf685  rhino1_5R5.zip

And that's what is in beta2, m28 and m29 (and thus also in xsltfilter10)

Maybe your rhino is different than what is in the tree?

It seems to be an OpenJDK issue, where no workaround is possible:

IRC log from #dev.openoffice.org:

<robilad> patch is at
http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6/file/63c7ccd8da7f/patches/icedtea-rhino.patch
<_rene_> robilad: what's the rationale for adding it? exchanging some binary stuff?
<robilad> it's not part of java 6 api, so it's not part of the open6 tarball,
but it is shipped along with sun jdk, so it was added back in.
<robilad> note that the rhino shipped by sun is 'bundled in', so it has been
moved into a sun-specific namespace.
<robilad> where as distributions just delegate that to the rhino package within
the mozilla namespace.
<robilad> so if you have code using (for whatever reasons) sun-internal
namespaces, you could experience issues - I don't know enough about rhino or the
scripting engine to be able to tell, though.
<robilad> you may want to raise the issue on the distro-pkg-dev@openjdk list,
though - that's where the icedtea folks are ;)

<Svante> rene_: What version of OpenJDK are you using, I got OpenJDK in my
environment, but I can not reproduce it (but not on Debian)
<_rene_> Svante_afk: ii  openjdk-6-jdk                      6b11-5  OpenJDK
Development Kit (JDK)
<_rene_> Svante_afk: Debians openjdk package. which, as robilad says, includes
that rhino patch he mentions
<_rene_> Svante_afk: thus we need a solution which works with both

AFAIK I belive there is no work-around
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2008-August/002835.html

Than to use a different OpenJDK or add the JAR to be build via -Xbootclasspath
to the OOo rhino module.

Please change status, if someone has a better idea..

sus->ab:
The reason for this issue is the special OpenJDK build (AFAIK works for Sun
builds), which includes Rhino with similar package structure.

There is already a reply:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2008-August/002838.html
and an issue opened
http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179

A possible workaround for this OOo build problem in that special environment
would be to update the Rhino of OOo to the version of the OpenJDK. This should
provide new JavaScript functionality as well.

Andreas you might evaluate if this is in general possible, in what timeframe,
etc., otherwise I would suggest to close this issue.

Thanks,
Svante

Final comment:

Rene can still try the workaround suggested from the reply linked before as
workaround:

"I think you can use -Xbootclasspath for javac to explicitly exclude the
rhino.jar (and only use the other standard bootclasses). But I haven't
tried myself yet."

It is hard for us to do so, as the build successed in our environment..

> "I think you can use -Xbootclasspath for javac to explicitly exclude the
> rhino.jar (and only use the other standard bootclasses). But I haven't
> tried myself yet."

If you tell me what I need to specify exactly, yes. 

>   -Xbootclasspath/p:<path>   Prepend to the bootstrap class path
>   -Xbootclasspath/a:<path>   Append to the bootstrap clidass path
>   -Xbootclasspath:<path>     Override location of bootstrap class files

is what javac tells me. But I neither want to append or prepend something, and I
neither want to override the whole bootstrap class path.. But I'll check..

>  It is hard for us to do so, as the build successed in our environment..

Yes, I see that you even don't want to try. It's not as if it would be hard to
find a distribution (development version) containing that OoenJDK and install it
a test machine ;-)

sus: and how do I specify that Xbootclasspath  thing in rhinos build.xml?

for the record, yes, using -Xbootclasspath works, (<compilerarg
value="-Xbootclasspath:/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/rt.jar"/> in thhe
javac tasks in rhinos ant.xml and scriptings ant.xml (com)

Created attachment 55728 [details]
patch I use for refence

close the invalid issue

reopening

pmladek has a generalized patch for this
(http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ooo-build/trunk/patches/dev300/buildfix-openjdk-6-no-rhino.diff?revision=14748&view=markup),
will add it.

done in cws configuretoplevel

.

looks good, verified

This issue is closed automatically and wasn't rechecked in a current version of
OOo. The fixed issue should be integrated in OOo since more than half a year. If
you think this issue isn't fixed in a current version (OOo 3.1), please reopen
it and change the field 'Target Milestone' accordingly.

If you want to download a current version of OOo =>
http://download.openoffice.org/index.html
If you want to know more about the handling of fixed/verified issues =>
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Handle_fixed_verified_issues

Sorry this issue was wrongly closed. This issue will be reopened automatically.
And will be set after that back to fixed/verified.

Set to state 'fixed'.

Set back to state 'verified/fixed'.

Again. Sorry for the mass of mails.

This issue is closed automatically. It should be fixed in a version with is
available for longer than half a year (OOo 3.1). If you think this issue isn't
fixed in the current version (OOo 3.2) please reopen it. But then please pay
attention about the field 'target milestone'.
The closure was approved by the Release Status Meeting at 22nd of February 2010
and it is based on the issue handling guideline for fixed/verified issues :
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Handle_fixed_verified_issues