Issue 925 - performance of loading/saving xml files bad
Summary: performance of loading/saving xml files bad
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 627
Hardware: PC Windows 98
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: frank
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL: http://http://
Keywords:
: 5962 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-05-21 03:40 UTC by issues@www
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:12 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description issues@www 2001-05-21 03:40:17 UTC 
When saving a Excel format file, the system will ask if you will save to 
the "better" OpenOffice Calc XML format, if you answer "yes" a small .sxc file 
will be saved (less than 100k, while the original Excel file may take about 1 
MB).

The resulted .sxc file cannot be subsequently opened by OpenOffice.

If the original file is in .sxc format, it seems that the above problem will 
not appear.
Comment 1 oc 2001-05-23 11:34:10 UTC 
Not reproducible. Please attach a bugdoc or give a more detailed description.
Comment 2 oc 2001-05-29 09:03:26 UTC 
Problem reproduced with bugdoc.
Comment 3 oc 2001-05-29 10:44:05 UTC 
*.sxc -file could be loaded but with a very poor performance.
Comment 4 sascha.ballach 2001-05-29 11:35:52 UTC 
I think this is fixed, but I'm currently working on the performance so it is 
possible, that the performance will go much better in the next time than now. 
In the next version the performance should be much better, but I hope to find 
more performance problems.
Comment 5 Unknown 2001-11-08 23:05:45 UTC 
changing QA contact from bugs@ to issues@
Comment 6 sascha.ballach 2001-12-19 08:38:26 UTC 
please close it, if you think it is fast enough
Comment 7 sascha.ballach 2001-12-19 08:39:27 UTC 
oh, this was the wrong bug, I take it back
Comment 8 sascha.ballach 2001-12-19 08:49:53 UTC 
I wanted to close this bug, but in the current version it needs 1 minute 25 seconds to 
load the ny.xls (saved as sxc). I think this is to slow, but at the moment I can nothing 
do, because we want to ship the 6.0 of Star Office and I don't want to insert new bugs 
while performance optimizing.

After the 6.0 releases I will work on it again.
Comment 9 sascha.ballach 2002-01-07 09:03:28 UTC 
I take it again.
Comment 10 stx123 2002-03-12 18:44:14 UTC 
P1->P2; not ooo1.0
Comment 11 frank 2002-06-19 08:20:25 UTC 
*** Issue 5962 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 12 sascha.ballach 2003-02-11 14:35:31 UTC 
performance should increase till beta
Comment 13 sascha.ballach 2003-02-12 11:31:20 UTC 
now P3, because it is much better, but not good enough
Comment 14 sascha.ballach 2003-02-14 13:17:50 UTC 
change summary
Comment 15 sascha.ballach 2003-04-14 11:38:53 UTC 
hopefully fixed in apps61beta2
Comment 16 sascha.ballach 2003-04-23 14:35:03 UTC 
I want to close this general issue now. If there are some special problems I think 
special issues will be a better solution.
Comment 17 frank 2003-04-25 12:47:12 UTC 
Found fixed on cws Apps61Beta2 using Windows and Solaris
Comment 18 frank 2003-04-25 12:48:36 UTC 
verified
Comment 19 frank 2003-04-30 15:22:09 UTC 
Found integrated on Solaris, Windows and Linux using srx644m13