Issue 95108 - Animated text is invisible ind presentation mode using hw accell
Summary: Animated text is invisible ind presentation mode using hw accell
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 94392
Alias: None
Product: Impress
Classification: Application
Component: viewing (show other issues)
Version: OOo 3.0
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: graphicsneedsconfirm
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords: oooqa, regression
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-10-18 05:21 UTC by rossnixon
Modified: 2008-10-29 14:52 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description rossnixon 2008-10-18 05:21:43 UTC 
Text that is animated to scroll back and forth, is visible in editing mode, but
invisible in slide-show mode. The same error happened several versions ago, but
was fixed.

Tested today in OOo 3.0 final.
I opened a presentation that works correctly in OOo 2.4.1.
I also added a new text animation to a slide, this also did not display in
slide-show mode.
Comment 1 wolframgarten 2008-10-20 09:33:02 UTC 
Sorry, not reproducible. Can you attach a file for reproduction, please?
Comment 2 Regina Henschel 2008-10-20 21:00:23 UTC 
This is likely a problem with the graphic card. Goto Tools > Options > OOo >
View and disable hardware acceleration. Does it works than? If yes, then it is
duplicate to issue 94392.
Comment 3 rossnixon 2008-10-22 09:12:49 UTC 
Turned off hardware acceleration as suggested.
This did make the animated text visible; but also caused multiple new video
display errors on several slides.

Note: I have both OOo 2.4.1 and 3.0 on the SAME computer. The slide show has no
errors at all in 2.4.1. Therefore there is no problem with the graphics card.
Comment 4 andreschnabel 2008-10-29 13:48:34 UTC 
confirmed using OOo 3.0.0 on win xp
Comment 5 andreschnabel 2008-10-29 14:52:06 UTC 
sorry .. this one is indeed a duplicate of 94392

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 94392 ***
Comment 6 andreschnabel 2008-10-29 14:52:49 UTC 
closed