Bug 50719 - NOP position in AFP output
Summary: NOP position in AFP output
Status: NEEDINFO
Alias: None
Product: Fop - Now in Jira
Classification: Unclassified
Component: pcl (show other bugs)
Version: all
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 enhancement
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: fop-dev
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-02-04 04:42 UTC by Sandeep
Modified: 2012-04-24 05:52 UTC (History)
0 users


Attachments
Nop position in output (52.30 KB, image/jpeg)
2011-02-04 04:46 UTC, Sandeep 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sandeep 2011-02-04 04:42:27 UTC 
Hi Everyone,

I am using FOP 1.0 tool to render an AFP output document with multiple pages. I am using afp extension elements <afp:no-operation> to insert information with each logical page in the output. The current implementation inserts the NOP within/inside the logical page, but my requirement is to put the NOP above/before the logical page in AFP output. This seems to be a valid requirement as per MO: DCA format but I could not find any way to configure this in current FOP 1.0 version.

My request is to provide an attribute or configuration parameter to define the position of NOP in afp output. I have attached an image file for reference.

Is it possible to get this feature added/fixed and delivered as a patch if this is a simple change? I am currently stuck with this and need to figure out my options.

Appreciate your help.

Thanks & Regards,
Sandeep
Comment 1 Sandeep 2011-02-04 04:46:55 UTC 
Created attachment 26603 [details]
Nop position in output

The attached image shows current output and expected output.
Comment 2 Glenn Adams 2012-04-07 01:42:05 UTC 
resetting P2 open bugs to P3 pending further review
Comment 3 Glenn Adams 2012-04-08 04:55:35 UTC 
please provide minimal input FO file containing an example of requested feature
Comment 4 Glenn Adams 2012-04-24 05:52:26 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> please provide minimal input FO file containing an example of requested feature

Sandeep, I am still awaiting your input as requested above. if I see no further input by April 30, I will close this bug due to lack of requested information. Regards, Glenn