On TIKA-2160, Seva Alekseyev shared a document that contains an SdtBlock that does not have an SdtPr. According to the ECMA standard [1] (pdf page 3842, printed page number 3832), an SdtBlock does not need to have an SdtPr. We should handle the case of a non-existent SdtPr. [1] http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA-376,%20Fourth%20Edition,%20Part%201%20-%20Fundamentals%20And%20Markup%20Language%20Reference.zip
r1768048
(In reply to Tim Allison from comment #1) > r1768048 I converted the unit test to junit 4 syntax, and marked test60341() @Ignore until you add the test data Bug60341.docx to the project. I need tests to pass so I can promote some changes.
The horror! Sorry, forgot to add the test doc to svn. Is 3kb worth the npe check? Not sure... r1768505