Hi, I try to start a httpd with an ProxyHCTemplate esb hcmethod=GET hcpasses=1 hcfails=1 hcinterval=30 hcuri=/esb/healthcheck in the httpd.conf and a blancer config in an VirtualHost section with <Proxy balancer://services> BalancerMember ajp://server1:8009 hctemplate=esb BalancerMember ajp://server2:8009 hctemplate=esb </Proxy> The start of the vhost stops with a 28000 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $HTTPD -k $cmd -D$server Without using an template (configuring the balancer like this:) <Proxy balancer://services> BalancerMember http://server1:8080 hcmethod=GET hcpasses=1 hcfails=1 hcinterval=30 hcuri=/esb/healthcheck BalancerMember http://server2:8080 hcmethod=GET hcpasses=1 hcfails=1 hcinterval=30 hcuri=/esb/healthcheck </Proxy> it works fine.
Hi, I can not reproduce with 2.4.39. Can you test with a newer version than 2.4.29? I don't know if it is a typo but the first BalancerMember are with ajp://, and the 2nd example is with http://
(In reply to Christophe JAILLET from comment #1) > Hi, > > I can not reproduce with 2.4.39. > Can you test with a newer version than 2.4.29? > > > I don't know if it is a typo but the first BalancerMember are with ajp://, > and the 2nd example is with http:// Hi Christophe. It it just a typo I tried both versions (ajp and http). I will test the config with a newer version and report the result . Kind regards Jörg
(In reply to Christophe JAILLET from comment #1) > Hi, > > I can not reproduce with 2.4.39. > Can you test with a newer version than 2.4.29? > > > I don't know if it is a typo but the first BalancerMember are with ajp://, > and the 2nd example is with http:// Hi Christophe. I retest it with 2.4.39 and the issue is still there... In the httpd.conf with code: ProxyHCTemplate esb hcmethod=GET hcpasses=1 hcfails=1 hcinterval=30 hcuri=/esb/healthcheck and in the balancer.includer with code: <Proxy "balancer://testcluster"> BalancerMember "ajp://server1:8009" hctemplate=esb BalancerMember "ajp://server2:8009" hctemplate=esb ProxySet lbmethod=bybusyness </Proxy>
Could you provide a backtrace of the core dump? I'm also wondering if this could be related to PR 60757 (and patch in comment 20) Could you apply this patch and re-test?