This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Summary: | Rhtml support STILL broken | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | ruby | Reporter: | infrid <infrid> |
Component: | RHTML | Assignee: | Torbjorn Norbye <tor> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | blocker | ||
Priority: | P3 | ||
Version: | 6.x | ||
Hardware: | Macintosh | ||
OS: | All | ||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Exception Reporter: |
Description
infrid
2007-04-18 18:46:21 UTC
Hi Infrid, with the previous bug (which is now fixed), the RHTML support broke a lot of -regular- Ruby editing features - editing a plain Ruby file no longer had formatting working, it used tab size 4 instead of 2, bracket matching was broken, comment/uncomment was broken, code completion for identifiers including "_" (such as Rails' send_file) was broken, etc. Thus, it was pretty serious and I thought people might want to hold off upgrading. Now that functionality is restored. RHTML support should be better than it was before; in particular, there is now a navigator display, and code completion should work within HTML tags. What is still not working (and is being worked on) is getting code completion working in the Ruby sections, getting code templates from Ruby and html to work, and of course fixing the issue with all the HTML parsing errors. But none of these should be blocking anybody, and there are lots of other good reasons to upgrade - such as basic rspec support, debugger improvements, code completion fixes, etc. *** Issue 101634 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** looks like ruby issue The completion in embedded ruby works now, the indentation/formatting is covered by different issue. I think this one can be closed, but letting Tor to decide. Yes, RHTML support is mostly working now; if there are specific remaining problems let's handle those with specific issues (as Marek said we already have one for indentation) |