This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Summary: | 4s in directory chooser | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | platform | Reporter: | Jindrich Sedek <jsedek> |
Component: | Directory Chooser | Assignee: | David Simonek <dsimonek> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | blocker | CC: | jiriprox, yardus |
Priority: | P4 | Keywords: | PERFORMANCE, RANDOM |
Version: | 6.x | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
URL: | http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=154315 | ||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Exception Reporter: | 154315 |
Attachments: | nps snapshot |
Description
Jindrich Sedek
2009-07-28 07:39:48 UTC
Created attachment 85293 [details]
nps snapshot
The most recent report http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/exception.do?id=242262 shows 4s delay in DirectoryChooser. One idea that could improve the situation is to use FixedHeightLayoutCache. Possible? java.beans.PropertyChangeSupport.firePropertyChange(): 4087 / 0 javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI$Handler.propertyChange(): 4087 / 0 javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI.setModel(): 4087 / 0 javax.swing.tree.VariableHeightLayoutCache.setModel(): 4087 / 0 javax.swing.tree.VariableHeightLayoutCache.rebuild(): 4087 / 0 javax.swing.tree.VariableHeightLayoutCache$TreeStateNode.expand(): 4087 / 0 javax.swing.tree.VariableHeightLayoutCache$TreeStateNode.expand(): 4087 / 0 javax.swing.tree.VariableHeightLayoutCache$TreeStateNode.updatePreferredSize(): 4075 / 0 javax.swing.tree.AbstractLayoutCache.getNodeDimensions(): 4075 / 26 javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI$NodeDimensionsHandler.getNodeDimensions(): 4048 / 0 org.netbeans.swing.dirchooser.DirectoryChooserUI$DirectoryTreeRenderer.getTreeCellRendererComponent(): 4048 / 0 org.netbeans.swing.dirchooser.DirectoryChooserUI$DirectoryTreeRenderer.getNodeIcon(): 3991 / 0 I don't know, I never used FixedHeightLayoutCache. And I never saw such slowness even on very big folders (nb repo) myself, so I assume this is low priority. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 169303 *** |