Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | Introduction of a List Level attribute for paragraph styles | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Writer | Reporter: | jade_gong <gongxuan> | ||||
Component: | code | Assignee: | AOO issues mailing list <issues> | ||||
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | Normal | ||||||
Priority: | P2 | CC: | elish, issues, orw, rb.henschel | ||||
Version: | OOO300m9 | Keywords: | ms_interoperability | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Issue Type: | ENHANCEMENT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||
Developer Difficulty: | Medium | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
jade_gong
2011-01-17 16:50:20 UTC
Created attachment 75579 [details]
A patch for the feature of "Introduction of a List Level attribute for paragraph styles"
Oliver is the experienced developer and should say, what to do with this patch. My opinion on it is this: The patch cannot be used in this form, because: - it is based on a version of OOo, likely around 2009. In the meantime some files were moved, e.g. from svx to cui - it has not a patch form - there exist no explanation what defect/feature the patch tries to solve and how it is done - it has author remarks, but we have agreed not to use such - it has a unclear license Thank you Regina. In the former days (before OpenOffice founds its new home at Apache) I already started to work on the integration of this work together with jade_gong. We had created a corresponding CWS, but due to the changing time in April 2011 this work was not finished. It is a feature that had been introduced in ODF 1.2 and it will also improve the interoperability with Microsoft Word documents. An corresponding specification document also exists - http://www.openoffice.org/specs/writer/numbering/ListLevel.odt Let us keep this issue open, may be someone (or myself) finds the time to introduce the feature based on the patch. I am volunteering to support the work on this issue, if someone picks it up. Sorry, this issue was in unconfirmed status and I didn't know developers may work on issues which are not confirmed. Thank you Oliver. (In reply to Edwin Sharp from comment #6) > Sorry, this issue was in unconfirmed status and I didn't know developers may > work on issues which are not confirmed. > Thank you Oliver. No problem. You just noticed that the status of this issue was not correct. |