Issue 31053

Summary:	please support https, too
Product:	ucb	Reporter:	rene
Component:	code	Assignee:	thorsten.martens
Status:	CLOSED FIXED	QA Contact:	issues@ucb <issues>
Severity:	Trivial
Priority:	P3	CC:	chris, issues, rvojta, www.openoffice.org
Version:	OOo 1.1.2
Target Milestone:	OOo 2.4
Hardware:	Other
OS:	All
Issue Type:	FEATURE	Latest Confirmation in:	---
Developer Difficulty:	---

Description rene 2004-07-03 01:03:58 UTC

Hi,

we received in the Debian BTS a wish for OOo to support https, too as it does
now for http (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=244280).

I foward it to you here :-)

Regards,

RenÃ©

Comment 1 matthias.huetsch 2004-07-05 11:23:12 UTC

Hi Kai,

I seem to remember that we once discussed this, but don't remember the outcome.
Can you please look into this, again, and comment on it?

Thanks,
Matthias

Comment 2 kai.sommerfeld 2004-07-27 16:43:41 UTC

Sorry, due to limited resourcs it is not planned to implement https support in
the OOo 2.0 timeframe.

Comment 3 Mathias_Bauer 2005-01-12 12:30:10 UTC

*** Issue 40283 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

Comment 4 kai.sommerfeld 2005-12-05 15:32:11 UTC

Andreas, please take care of this feature.

Comment 5 andreas.bille 2006-05-24 17:26:33 UTC

accepted

Comment 6 andreas.bille 2006-06-14 10:44:52 UTC

accepted

Comment 7 andreas.bille 2007-04-03 16:02:33 UTC

ABI->KSO: As discussed ...

Comment 8 andreas.bille 2007-04-03 16:08:23 UTC

ABI->KSO: As discussed ...

Comment 9 kai.sommerfeld 2007-04-05 08:11:22 UTC

Comment 10 kai.sommerfeld 2007-08-15 12:35:50 UTC

KSO->TKR: Please take care of this issue.

Comment 11 tkr 2007-08-16 08:39:37 UTC

Comment 12 tkr 2007-09-06 14:06:49 UTC

*** Issue 32935 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

Comment 13 kai.sommerfeld 2007-09-25 09:50:28 UTC

*** Issue 72021 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

Comment 14 rene 2007-10-05 13:19:41 UTC

tkr: why openssl (BSD, and has some problems with GPLed stuff which probably can
affect GPLed extensions?) instead of GnuTLS? (LGPL, except GNUTLS-EXTRA which is
GPL, but we don't need to use that and if it causes problems for the source we
can remove this part?)?

I think there should be a choice between OpenSSL and GNUTLS... (the neon in
Debian has a flavour built with gnutls, which I'll probably switch to - didn't
notice till a few days ago)

Comment 15 tkr 2007-10-08 14:48:58 UTC

I don't see any problem if you want to build NEON against GNUTLS instead of
OpenSSL and link it with OOo.

At the moment we only use OpenSSL with NEON, so you can replace it with GNUTLS
with no side effects, i guess.

Openssl is older and more widely used. Thats the root cause why we chose this one.

Comment 16 tkr 2007-10-22 08:09:04 UTC

ready for qa

Comment 17 tkr 2007-10-22 08:10:27 UTC

tkr->rt: please take care of this issue

Comment 18 rt 2007-11-01 10:34:48 UTC

Please verify on CWS tkr05.

Comment 19 thorsten.martens 2007-11-06 10:41:24 UTC

checked and verified in cws tkr05 -> OK !

Comment 20 thorsten.martens 2009-04-28 09:10:50 UTC

closed