Issue 34475

Summary: Master document ignores manual page breaks in subdocs
Product: Writer Reporter: jeanweber
Component: codeAssignee: frank.meies
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: issues@sw <issues>
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P3 CC: esigra, issues
Version: OOo 1.1.2Keywords: oooqa
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
Master doc, its subdocs, and the template upon which all are based none

Description jeanweber 2004-09-22 01:20:37 UTC 
Under specific circumstances, a master document ignores manual page breaks in 
subdocuments. This occurs in OOo1.1.2, 1.1.3, and 1.9m54 (which are all the 
releases that I have tested).

If a subdoc contains a manual page break with no specified following page style, 
the manual break is recognized by the master doc, as it should be.

However, if a subdocument contains a manual page break with a following page 
style specified, the manual page break is ignored when the subdoc is opened in 
the master doc.

This problem is demonstrated in the attached zip file, which contains a master 
doc, its subdocs, and the template upon which all are based. If you open the 
subdocs individually, you will see the correct page breaks. 

Jean
Comment 1 jeanweber 2004-09-22 01:22:17 UTC 
Created attachment 17849 [details]
Master doc, its subdocs, and the template upon which all are based
Comment 2 jeanweber 2004-09-22 01:25:08 UTC 
Same problem occurs in 1.1.2, 1.1.3, and 1.9m54, which are all the versions of 
OOo that I have tested.
--Jean
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2004-09-22 07:26:32 UTC 
reassigned to ES.
Comment 4 eric.savary 2004-09-22 16:00:23 UTC 
Page breaks linked to a page style won't be displayed in master document (even
if importing the page style into the MD)
Comment 5 Oliver Specht 2004-09-27 09:14:55 UTC 
->FME: Please have a look
Comment 6 meurin 2005-01-04 11:13:59 UTC 
Is this issue connected to issue 14253? See especially "Additional comments from
dvo Fri Nov 26 11:19:57 -0800 2004" in issue 14253.
Comment 7 lohmaier 2006-08-31 21:58:30 UTC 
duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 32141 ***
Comment 8 lohmaier 2006-08-31 21:58:54 UTC 
closing duplicate