Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | enum is a reserved word in Java JDK 1.5 (build fails on Java 5) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | General | Reporter: | Dwayne Bailey <dwayne> | ||||
Component: | code | Assignee: | caolanm | ||||
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | issues@framework <issues> | ||||
Severity: | Trivial | ||||||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | caolanm, davidf, issues, pavel | ||||
Version: | 680m142 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | OOo 2.0.3 | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Issue Type: | PATCH | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||
Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||
Issue Depends on: | |||||||
Issue Blocks: | 65112 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Dwayne Bailey
2005-12-14 21:27:20 UTC
Created attachment 32408 [details]
Rename all enum variables to stop JDK 1.5 errors
TM->MH:please have a look. TM->MIB: As ST told me, you might have a look, because MH isn´t on duty today Svante, can you please care about this patch. Actually Lars' can remember to have resolved the same or a similar issue already, so it might be that the issue is already resolved in some other branch. started Renamed Java 5 key word 'enum' to 'enumeration' (according to patch) and tested by JDK 5 compilation. *** Issue 59797 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** *** Issue 62918 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** *** Issue 63371 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** *** Issue 57544 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** Please verify fix in CWS latex re-open issue and reassign to jw@openoffice.org reassign to jw@openoffice.org reset resolution to FIXED reassign to SUS please find a nother developer to verify this issue re-open issue and reassign to sus reassign to sus reset resolution to FIXED reassign to sus reset resolution to FIXED reopening. CWS latex has target 2.0.4. This issue is a build breaker. We want to have ti fixed in 2.0.3. We really do not want to answer millions of questions about compilation and mark another million of issues to eb duplicate of this one. Are you OK to create separate cws just for this fix? I'll do it... Hi Pavel, thanks for you proposal. The CWS willl be integrated in pp3, just back from vacations. Will sort this out. Thanks, Svante SUS->SW: Stephan could you please verifiy this issue in CWS Latex for me, thanks.. resetting to fixed ok in cws_latex => verified /me still expects this to be integrated in 2.0.3 according to target. reopening. Fixed in cws java15enum. Caolan: can you please verife/approve the cws? yeah, fine SRC680m170/OOC680_m2 Updated summary to allow keyword searchs. James McKenzie |