Issue 83912

I recently switched to OOo2.3 from OOo2.0 just for the new motion path animation
features.  Yay!

Unfortunately, there appears to be a problem with motion path animations and cpu
utilization.  Even the simplest animation causes baseline cpu utilization of the
soffice.bin application to increase.  I have created myself a brand new user
configuration, opened a brand new Presentation without templates, dropped a
filled circle in the middle of a single slide, and attached a 5-point motion
path to it.  If I restart OOo, and open this file, I see the CPU utilization
idling at 1%

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
30592 krlynch   20   0  196m  64m  44m S    1  6.4   0:03.14 soffice.bin

If I run the animation once, the CPU utilization now idles slightly higher,
around 8%

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
30592 krlynch   20   0  196m  64m  44m S    8  6.4   0:05.80 soffice.bin

After running the animation 10 times, soffice.bin is now idling at at whopping 70%,

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
30592 krlynch   20   0  197m  64m  44m S   68  6.4   0:45.32 soffice.bin

which never decreases, and successive runs of the animation begin to lag and
stutter.

A more realistic animation from a talk I am in the process of assembling causes
unreasonable CPU utilization after one run; it has 9 different motion paths run
successively, and causes the idle cpu utilization to rise from around 1% to 60%.
  Three more runs gets me up to 95%.  The quality of the second run is so poor
that I couldn't in good conscience show it to an audience.

I've been doing these tests in a Fedora Core 6 installation, on a Core 2 Duo
based laptop with 1GB RAM, and the 2.3.0-9221 rpms downloaded from the
OpenOffice.org website.  uname -a gives 2.6.22.9-61.fc6 #1 SMP for kernel version.