Bug 5916 - Is the URI extractor being over-efficient here?
Summary: Is the URI extractor being over-efficient here?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Spamassassin
Classification: Unclassified
Component: spamassassin (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2.4
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P5 minor
Target Milestone: Undefined
Assignee: SpamAssassin Developer Mailing List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-06-04 02:51 UTC by James Wilkinson
Modified: 2019-10-02 11:33 UTC (History)
1 user (show)


Attachment Type Modified Status Actions Submitter/CLA Status
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description James Wilkinson 2008-06-04 02:51:01 UTC
Comment 1 James Wilkinson 2008-06-04 03:02:45 UTC 
Sorry, not sure what happened there.

Thanks for a wonderful program!

I'm looking at an HTML e-mail containing
<td background=3D"5%" rowspan=3D"5">
SpamAssassin appears to consider that the "5%" might be a URI, and is looking up 0.0.0.5 in all configured URIDNSBLs.

(I'm testing this by removing 'background=3D"5%' from the e-mail, and 0.0.0.5 goes away from the list of URIs in spamassassin -d -D -t < email.eml)

Are there really any HTML engines that will try loading a background from 0.0.0.5 (in which case SpamAssassin is perfectly justified in checking it)?

Otherwise, not checking 0.0.0.5 would take a bit of unnecessary load off the URIBLS.

Thanks,

James.
Comment 2 Henrik Krohns 2019-10-02 11:33:38 UTC 
Pretty sure not an issue anymore, closing.