SA Bugzilla – Bug 685
rules: New and improved WINNER Rules
Last modified: 2002-08-22 19:30:30 UTC
I'm on a roll here. Replaces all other winner rules. OVERALL SPAM NONSPAM NAME 15645 10416 5229 (all messages) 452 445 7 WIN 174 167 7 WINNING 129 128 1 YOU_WON 130 124 6 WINNER body WINNER /\b(?:you.{0,4} a|lucky|big|next) winner\b|winner!|(?-i:WINNER)/i describe WINNER Claims you are a winner body YOU_WON /\byou(?:'ve| have)? won(?!'|\w)/i describe YOU_WON You have WON! body WIN /\b(?:register|chances?|opportunity|enter|entered|players?|more|could)\b.{0,9}\bwin\b|win .{0,9}(?:!|up to|cash|big|car|now|free|\$[0-9,\.\$]+)\b/i describe WIN Who really wins? body WINNING /\bwinning (?:strategies|entry|cash|numbers?|free|!)\b|(?-i:WINNING)|award.winning|\bclaim your winnings/i describe WINNING Winning Stuff
Subject: Re: [SAdev] New: New and improved WINNER Rules On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 the voices made bugzilla-daemon@hughes-family.org write: > http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=685 > body WINNER /\b(?:you.{0,4} a|lucky|big|next) > winner\b|winner!|(?-i:WINNER)/i The extra winner parts doesn't make any sense to me, winner\b is enough. > body YOU_WON /\byou(?:'ve| have)? won(?!'|\w)/i We got this one right close to two weeks ago, wasn't it submitted then? /Tony
Subject: Re: [SAdev] New and improved WINNER Rules Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 the voices made bugzilla-daemon@hughes-family.org write: http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=685 body WINNER /\b(?:you.{0,4} a|lucky|big|next) winner\b|winner!|(?-i:WINNER)/i If winner is lower case then it has to be combined with "lucky,big,etc". But if it's all caps or has an ! after it then winner by itself matches. > The extra winner parts doesn't make any sense to me, winner\b is enough. body YOU_WON /\byou(?:'ve| have)? won(?!'|\w)/i > We got this one right close to two weeks ago, wasn't it submitted then? Yes - it didn't change. I gathered up all the winner rules and tested and modified them together. That one stayed the same.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 710 ***