This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 144295 - java.util.ConcurrentModificationException: Caller uses obsolete token sequence which is no longer valid. Underlying token hierarchy has been modified: modCount=4 != upToDateModCount=5 Please report ag
Summary: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException: Caller uses obsolete token sequenc...
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: soa
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-08-18 18:18 UTC by Nam Nguyen
Modified: 2008-08-22 12:55 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 93643

Attachments
stacktrace (3.56 KB, text/plain)
2008-08-18 18:18 UTC, Nam Nguyen 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nam Nguyen 2008-08-18 18:18:06 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE 6.1 (Build 200804211638)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 10.0-b22, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_06-b02
OS: SunOS, 5.11, x86

User Comments: 
Editing source of persistence.xml (with multiple units), changing an attribute value (toplink logging level).

Stacktrace: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
        at javax.swing.LayoutComparator.compare(LayoutComparator.java:100)
        at javax.swing.DefaultFocusManager.compareTabOrder(DefaultFocusManager.java:130)
        at javax.swing.CompareTabOrderComparator.compare(CompareTabOrderComparator.java:153)
        at java.util.Arrays.mergeSort(Arrays.java:1270)
        at java.util.Arrays.mergeSort(Arrays.java:1282)
        at java.util.Arrays.sort(Arrays.java:1210)
Comment 1 Nam Nguyen 2008-08-18 18:18:23 UTC 
Created attachment 67726 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Lukas Hasik 2008-08-22 12:46:55 UTC 
imo, it has nothing with the core, reassigning. Is this issue reproducible? Any better steps to reproduce?
Comment 3 Vladimir Yaroslavskiy 2008-08-22 12:55:03 UTC 
can't reproduce.