This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 15509 - [upgrade]HTML and plain editor kit is not used after upgrade from 3.2
Summary: [upgrade]HTML and plain editor kit is not used after upgrade from 3.2
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: Sun Solaris
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@editor
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-09-14 11:31 UTC by Jan Lahoda
Modified: 2007-11-05 13:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jan Lahoda 2001-09-14 11:31:49 UTC
I did upgrade from 3.2.1 (build98) to dev (200109140100). I did one clean start
on 3.2.1 and one start on dev.
When I try to open HTML file in dev, it is not colored at all. Not features of
NB html editor (code completion) do not work.
Comment 1 Jan Lahoda 2001-09-14 11:33:50 UTC
This issue could have connection with this:
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15395
(there is also more info on upgrading).
Comment 2 Jan Lahoda 2001-09-14 11:50:41 UTC
The same applies to plain kit. For both do not work annotations
adding, so they probably are not the ones from editor module.
Comment 3 Jan Lahoda 2001-09-14 12:49:23 UTC
200109140100 marked as corrupted. This bug occurs also with
200109130100.
Comment 4 Petr Nejedly 2001-09-17 16:58:40 UTC
Seems it doesn't work generally, not only after import.
Comment 5 Jan Lahoda 2001-09-19 09:48:25 UTC
*** Issue 14880 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 Jan Lahoda 2001-09-19 10:07:17 UTC
*** Issue 15571 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 7 Miloslav Metelka 2001-09-21 11:27:23 UTC
fixed in EditorModule.java.
Petre N., please look at the fix. I have deleted removing of the
text/plain and html from the original map because I think the original
map should be saved as it was. In fact now the xml registrations are
preferred to the regular registrations. I think it's OK but if you
want we can allow overridings but rather through another overrideMap
because I think that the code will be somewhat clearer in this way.
Comment 8 Jan Lahoda 2001-10-05 11:11:34 UTC
Verified in 200110050100.
Comment 9 Quality Engineering 2003-06-30 18:12:11 UTC
Resolved for 3.3.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.