This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 55755 - invalid sun-ejb-jar.xml is not being marked as invalid
Summary: invalid sun-ejb-jar.xml is not being marked as invalid
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: serverplugins
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Sun Appserver 8 (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: _ pcw
URL:
Keywords:
: 67290 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 56671 62787
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-03-02 09:39 UTC by Petr Blaha
Modified: 2007-04-21 07:25 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Petr Blaha 2005-03-02 09:39:23 UTC 
In the project logical view sun-ejb-jar DD is
represented is by the same icon whether valid or
invalid, well-formed or not well-formed
Comment 1 _ ludo 2005-03-02 16:52:46 UTC 
The data object is owned by j2eeserver...
Comment 2 Pavel Buzek 2005-03-19 05:01:05 UTC 
Working on this.
Comment 3 Pavel Buzek 2005-03-19 15:52:37 UTC 
I could not find a way to get the correct status from XMLDataObject. If this
does not work I cannot fix this issue easilly in 4.1.
The DDDataObject uses XMLMultiviewData which gives the correct status.
BTW: this was never implemented in 3.6 or 4.0 and the confusion results from
using the same icon for server spec data as for standard DD ;-). Standard xml
files also do not show any error badge.
Comment 4 Pavel Buzek 2005-08-25 05:37:29 UTC 
yet another one, plugin will be in charge of the loader for config files
Comment 5 _ pcw 2005-11-10 00:08:12 UTC 
*** Issue 67290 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 _ pcw 2005-12-13 07:32:12 UTC 
Adding parse status to the dataobject is too complex to do during hard code
freeze.  Deferring to next release.
Comment 7 _ pcw 2006-09-09 02:12:30 UTC 
Defer this til we move to multiview... not worth updating existing
infrastructure to handle it.
Comment 8 Vince Kraemer 2007-01-20 02:12:47 UTC 
we should go to multiview in this release
Comment 9 _ pcw 2007-04-21 07:18:36 UTC 
This works now.