This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 56134 - DeploymentManagerCreationException in messages.log
Summary: DeploymentManagerCreationException in messages.log
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 64637
Alias: None
Product: serverplugins
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Infrastructure (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: All All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Sherold Dev
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-03-10 10:50 UTC by Lukas Jungmann
Modified: 2006-03-25 12:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
messages.log (22.46 KB, text/plain)
2005-03-10 10:51 UTC, Lukas Jungmann
Details
log with IOException (57.78 KB, text/plain)
2005-03-10 16:19 UTC, Lukas Jungmann
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lukas Jungmann 2005-03-10 10:50:46 UTC
[build 200503092050]

-start IDE with new user (don't register app server, if you register one and
then remove it, exception does not occur)
-open one of the samples from BP solutions catalog

=> resolve missing server problem... - this msg is OK, but see what's in
messages.log:

javax.enterprise.deploy.spi.exceptions.DeploymentManagerCreationException: Deplo
ymentManagerCreationExceptionnull
Comment 1 Lukas Jungmann 2005-03-10 10:51:39 UTC
Created attachment 20741 [details]
messages.log
Comment 2 Lukas Jungmann 2005-03-10 16:16:07 UTC
I followed steps above, but now I restarted IDE before resolving server. And now
I've found IOExeption in message.log, so I'm increasing priority to P3.
Comment 3 Lukas Jungmann 2005-03-10 16:19:19 UTC
Created attachment 20758 [details]
log with IOException
Comment 4 _ ludo 2005-03-10 19:04:30 UTC
The plugin throws a valid except, per the 88 spec.
The plugin is not printing it.
So the code to modify is on the caller side, i.e j2eeserver side, I think
Comment 5 Pavel Buzek 2005-09-21 04:33:19 UTC
May I ask what's the problem? I thought that when user reads INFORMATIONAL then
this would be informational enough to convey this is not a WARNING, an ERROR or
an EXCEPTION they need to be concerned about. I do not see any other exception
then INFORMATIONAL. Does the server sepcific configuration editing work OK? Does
deployment work OK?
Comment 6 Sherold Dev 2005-09-21 12:11:22 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 64637 ***
Comment 7 Lukas Jungmann 2006-03-25 11:54:26 UTC
v.
Comment 8 Lukas Jungmann 2006-03-25 12:38:23 UTC
c.