This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 58679 - Exception occures while trying to change butonCount property in a ButtonGruoup
Summary: Exception occures while trying to change butonCount property in a ButtonGruoup
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 58529
Alias: None
Product: guibuilder
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Natural Layout (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: Sun All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@guibuilder
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-05-09 09:02 UTC by Max Sauer
Modified: 2005-10-17 10:16 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
screenshot (91.57 KB, image/png)
2005-05-09 09:03 UTC, Max Sauer
Details
messages.log file (13.89 KB, text/plain)
2005-05-09 09:04 UTC, Max Sauer
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Max Sauer 2005-05-09 09:02:39 UTC
NoSuchMethodException error occures when trying to change the buttonCount
property in a ButtonGroup (through clikning the "[...]" icon). The field with
button count shows zero, and is disabled (see screenshot).

Steps to reproduce this:
------------------------
1) Set up a new project -> JavaApplication
2) Add a JFrame Form
3) Add a ButtonGroup and try to change the ButtonCount property.

System Specs:
--------------
NetBeans 4.2dev 200505081800
j2sdk1.4.2_05

added modules LayoutExtensions.jar, size 96219
              org-netbeans-modules-form.jar, size 3220679
both build /form_prototype/20050429
Comment 1 Max Sauer 2005-05-09 09:03:37 UTC
Created attachment 22013 [details]
screenshot
Comment 2 Max Sauer 2005-05-09 09:04:51 UTC
Created attachment 22014 [details]
messages.log file
Comment 3 Max Sauer 2005-05-09 09:25:03 UTC
Using the new build (/form_prototype/20050509), the exception can't be
reproduced.  But the field "buttonCount" is still disabled.
Comment 4 Jan Stola 2005-05-09 09:38:04 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 58529 ***
Comment 5 Max Sauer 2005-10-17 10:16:35 UTC
Verified duplicate.