This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 64181 - A NullPointerException occurs in "Add Module Dependency"
Summary: A NullPointerException occurs in "Add Module Dependency"
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: apisupport
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Martin Krauskopf
URL:
Keywords:
: 64285 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-09-13 08:41 UTC by Jan Lahoda
Modified: 2005-09-14 07:12 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
The NullPointerException. (4.22 KB, text/plain)
2005-09-13 08:42 UTC, Jan Lahoda 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jan Lahoda 2005-09-13 08:41:19 UTC 
Own build, checked out yesterday.

Each time I go into the Project Properties/Libraries/Add (dialog "Add Module
Dependency") and type a few characters, the attached NullPointerException
occurs. The project is an netbeans.org project (checked out stable_nowww+a few
more modules: contrib, collab maybe others). Please let me know if you need more
info.
Comment 1 Jan Lahoda 2005-09-13 08:42:50 UTC 
Created attachment 24723 [details]
The NullPointerException.
Comment 2 Martin Krauskopf 2005-09-13 08:46:00 UTC 
Introduced with javadoc buttons. Sorry. Started...
Comment 3 Martin Krauskopf 2005-09-13 10:26:06 UTC 
Fixed. Also fixing working Javadoc Button for NetBeans.org modules if theirs
javadoc was build (into nbbuild/build/javadoc). Having semi-reasonable test, but
too restrictive (needs *not* built javadoc for e.g. openide/fs). Also I'm not
sure if it is good to build javadoc during test run (another case) -> not
commiting yet, considering better one...

Checking in Util.java; 1.18 --> 1.19
Checking in ui/customizer/AddModulePanel.java; 1.17 --> 1.18
Comment 4 Jan Lahoda 2005-09-13 13:52:55 UTC 
Verified with current sources. Thanks.
Comment 5 Martin Krauskopf 2005-09-14 07:12:56 UTC 
*** Issue 64285 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***