This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 66575 - [50cat] Label missing for project nodes
Summary: [50cat] Label missing for project nodes
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: versioncontrol
Classification: Unclassified
Component: CVS (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker with 1 vote (vote)
Assignee: issues@versioncontrol
: 115417 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 60970
  Show dependency tree
Reported: 2005-10-12 10:10 UTC by Peter Pis
Modified: 2007-09-13 09:52 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Exception Reporter:


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Peter Pis 2005-10-12 10:10:36 UTC
Product Version       = NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200510111800)
Operating System      = Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86
Java; VM; Vendor      = 1.5.0_05; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.5.0_05-b05; Sun
Microsystems Inc.
Java Home             = d:\Java\jdk1.5.0_05\jre

Label is not displayed for Project nodes.

1. Check out sources, open project.
2. Check "View | Show CVS status and labels"
Comment 1 Maros Sandor 2005-10-14 11:14:19 UTC
Scheduling for the future for now.
Comment 2 Maros Sandor 2005-11-01 16:09:48 UTC
I think issuzilla is poluted enough with [50cat] labels already.
Comment 3 Jiri Kovalsky 2005-11-01 19:48:30 UTC
This issue needs to wear [50cat] prefix in its summary as it was discovered by
NetCAT program member no matter the actual reporter is somebody else. For more
details see issue #65583. In addition to that please note that [50cat] prefix is
not here to "pollute" the Issuezilla but to highlight issues that bother _real_
users of our product.
Comment 4 Maros Sandor 2005-11-02 09:28:25 UTC
That is simply not true but I don't care that much to start a useless quarrel on
Comment 5 pholthuizen 2006-06-04 07:13:09 UTC
It's not only the labelling but also the coloring is not available on project
level and package level. I don't think this as a defect but a feature request.

This is depends on 60970, but I don't see why. I guess the depedency is only
there to provide an example?

Patrick Holthuizen
Comment 6 Peter Pis 2007-09-13 09:52:47 UTC
*** Issue 115417 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***