This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 74830 - IOE: Unevaluated properties in ${nbplatform.NetBeans_IDE_5.0_(Build_200601251500).netbeans.dest.dir}
Summary: IOE: Unevaluated properties in ${nbplatform.NetBeans_IDE_5.0_(Build_200601251...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 69029
Alias: None
Product: apisupport
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jesse Glick
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-04-11 12:58 UTC by Tomas Danek
Modified: 2006-10-23 16:39 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
ioe (1.43 KB, text/plain)
2006-04-11 12:59 UTC, Tomas Danek 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tomas Danek 2006-04-11 12:58:26 UTC 
NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200603270859)
1.6.0-rc; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.6.0-rc-b66
Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86
en_US (nb); Cp1252

I was not able to reproduce again, probably something somewhere was messed, but
stacktrace may be helpful.
I created module in trunk, then opened it's properties and switched source level
to 1.5 and platform to 5.0 FCS (was registred before). Tried do build it, got:

C:\Documents and Settings\Tomas Musil\60\build.xml:7: The following error
occurred while executing this line:

C:\Documents and Settings\Tomas Musil\60\nbproject\build-impl.xml:19: You must
define 'nbplatform.NetBeans_IDE_5.0_(Build_200601251500).harness.dir'

After opening properties again, 
got IOE (attached).
Comment 1 Tomas Danek 2006-04-11 12:59:04 UTC 
Created attachment 29754 [details]
ioe
Comment 2 Jesse Glick 2006-04-12 16:48:34 UTC 
Probably can't do anything with it unless you know how to reproduce, sorry.
Platform definition probably wrong. There are already some open robustness bugs
re. modules using incorrect platform definitions; no plans to fix in the near
future.
Comment 3 Tomas Danek 2006-04-24 13:37:31 UTC 
duplicate of #69029
Comment 4 Tomas Danek 2006-04-24 13:38:09 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 69029 ***
Comment 5 Tomas Danek 2006-04-24 13:39:00 UTC 
closing.