This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 78411 - RE Operation: local to the block Lifeline is painted outside the bounds of combined fragment
Summary: RE Operation: local to the block Lifeline is painted outside the bounds of co...
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: uml
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Reverse Engineering (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@uml
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-19 23:26 UTC by bugbridge
Modified: 2008-07-31 18:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
block try catch (75.89 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-06-19 23:27 UTC, Peter Lam
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description bugbridge 2006-06-19 23:26:27 UTC
Original status: 1-Dispatched; Suggested Status: NEW

These items should be added to the Status Whiteboard: UML_UST
Original submitter: sunflower

Description:
Steps to reproduce:

- Do Reverse Engineering of 'testBlockTryCatch' method and create a Sequence
diagram:

  ---------------------------------------------------------------
    public void testBlockTryCatch() throws Exception{
        try {
            
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        
        }catch(InterruptedException e){
            
            throw new Exception (e);
    
        }
    }
  ---------------------------------------------------------------

- There is a 'e:' Lifeline on the Sequence diagram which is created outside the
bounds of 
  'assert' combined fragment. (See attached picture)
Comment 1 Peter Lam 2006-06-19 23:27:34 UTC
Created attachment 31192 [details]
block try catch
Comment 2 Kris Richards 2006-12-06 00:54:01 UTC
The data is correct. This is a visual issue. It is possible that this will not be able to be fixed with the 
current infrastructure.
Comment 3 Sergey Petrov 2008-05-14 15:01:27 UTC
it's inside now, because placed in order of appearance
yet there is another issue now.
Comment 4 Peter Lam 2008-07-31 18:10:10 UTC
verified in build 20080730