This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Installation under Vista works fine, but after installation AS doesn't start due to invalid permissions on "domains" directory - starter process unable to acces required files. After setting full access for all users AS starts as expected.
Was there any announcement that EntPack support Windows Vista? I haven`t seen it anywhere. Correct? After all what about the installation log? I see no attach. What about detail information about the user (who installed EntPack) rights? What about the "full access" rights determination?
Created attachment 33506 [details] exception
Created attachment 33507 [details] installation log
There is no announced Vista support but it's coming so this issue filed. User, installed pack, is member of Administrators group. As for "full access" - it's just full access or Full Control in terms of Windows NTFS security.
Please try the same scenario under user with english letters only (I mean no names like "Иван Сидорокин") The first unexpected error in the log is that the Access Manager war was deployed with error: CLI171 Command deploy failed : Deploying application in domain failed; Cannot determine the Java EE module type for C:\Users\???? ???????? \AppData\Local\Temp\s1astempdomain1server1142715591\amserver.war [2006/08/31 11:17:41]: [return]: 0
Well, user already renamed to User and russian letters are in the comments or something like this. We'll investigate because Vista is new and looks strange in some areas... BTW I think i18n should work fine with any kind of characters :)
I'm curious, is the AS installation successful, if you use its own installer? Or it's an issue solely with Ent. Pack installer?
Standalone AS installer works fine and installed server able to start.
Lowering priority, since Vista is not the target/priority platform.
Since this issue is no longer relevant, closing as WONTFIX. Please file further issues against the NBI-based installer.