This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 85694 - Redefinition of class failing
Summary: Redefinition of class failing
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: profiler
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Base (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@profiler
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-09-25 15:51 UTC by _ rkubacki
Modified: 2007-02-14 16:42 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
log from profiled IDE (149.49 KB, text/plain)
2006-09-26 07:47 UTC, _ rkubacki 		Details
log from profiling IDE (55.23 KB, text/plain)
2006-09-26 07:49 UTC, _ rkubacki 		Details
classes archive (666.95 KB, application/x-gzip)
2006-09-26 09:05 UTC, _ rkubacki 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description _ rkubacki 2006-09-25 15:51:36 UTC 
Dev build of IDE from Sep 25, profiler build from Sep 18, JDK 6b99

Profiling of another IDE instance shows info about failed redefinition of
classes. Error code is often 71 sometimes 67.
Comment 1 Tomas Hurka 2006-09-25 18:54:43 UTC 
Please attach message log from both IDEs. Thanks.
Comment 2 Tomas Hurka 2006-09-25 18:57:35 UTC 
I never saw that with JDK 1.5
Comment 3 _ rkubacki 2006-09-26 07:47:29 UTC 
Created attachment 34484 [details]
log from profiled IDE
Comment 4 _ rkubacki 2006-09-26 07:49:39 UTC 
Created attachment 34486 [details]
log from profiling IDE
Comment 5 _ rkubacki 2006-09-26 07:55:09 UTC 
This happened to me during profiling of issue #84169 and profiling from root
method 'void FileObject.postEvent(int, Enumeration, FileEvent)'. It seems that
result is distorted significantly.
Comment 6 _ rkubacki 2006-09-26 09:05:27 UTC 
Created attachment 34494 [details]
classes archive
Comment 7 Tomas Hurka 2007-02-14 16:42:19 UTC 
Closing as works-for-me. If you can still reproduce it, please reopen.