Issue 108036

Summary: Spreadsheet crashes on DataPilot drill down
Product: Calc Reporter: ron_ <ronald.liebman>
Component: viewingAssignee: AOO issues mailing list <issues>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P3 CC: elish, issues, rb.henschel, rbircher
Version: OOO310m19   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: HP (PA-RISC)   
OS: Linux, all   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Description ron_ 2010-01-02 18:44:03 UTC
I am using OpenOffice.org Calc v 3.1.1 build 9240 for Ubuntu.  Drilling down on
a DataPilot sometimes causes OOO to fail and Document Recovery to begin.

My DataPilot has two row fields and one column field.  Drilling down on the
highest level row field is successful, but drilling down on the lowest level row
field or on the single column field causes the error.
Comment 1 Regina Henschel 2010-01-02 19:07:34 UTC
It sounds like a duplicate to issue 103347.

Please try it again with the newest version from openoffice.org.
Comment 2 ron_ 2010-01-02 20:22:51 UTC
I agree that this sounds like a duplicate of 103347.  Sorry that I did not catch
that when I searched.
Comment 3 Raphael Bircher 2010-01-03 17:33:35 UTC
rbircher > ron_ It's not a problem if you make a dublicate. Sametimes it's not
easy to finde dublicate. I will close this issue now as dublicate for you

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 103347 ***
Comment 4 Raphael Bircher 2010-01-03 17:34:01 UTC
close
Comment 5 ron_ 2010-01-06 03:44:54 UTC
My ver 3.1.1 looks like it is the newest version currently available.  This
version was released August 31, 2009 -- later than your main discussion with
rmano on issue 103347.

Your most recent instruction to rmano [...please have a look at
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Run_OOo_versions_parallel
section 1.2 ] seems pretty complicated and risky for a newbie like me.

Is this specific problem fixed in v 3.2 -- which is scheduled to be released
later this month -- rather than in v 3.1.1?  Wouldn't it be easier just to
upgrade, rather than to run parallel versions?
Comment 6 Edwin Sharp 2013-08-23 14:35:23 UTC
Bug 103347 is closed irreproducible.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 103347 ***