Issue 10106 - Open a link-file
Summary: Open a link-file
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: www (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: lo
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-12-16 13:59 UTC by lorenzoneri
Modified: 2004-12-01 11:02 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description lorenzoneri 2002-12-16 13:59:54 UTC 
(I use Windows XP Pro in the client and Linux Red Hat 7.3 in the server , 
release of OpenOffice : 1.0.1) . Every time that I open a document that does 
not reside physically in hard disk of my computer but in folder of the server , 
the document appears me totaly white . If I make a copy of the file on my 
desktop and re-open the same file all works ok . My sensation is that if you 
try to open a link , openoffice falls in error ....

Thank you for your attention ! 
Lorenzo
Comment 1 luctur 2002-12-20 10:34:20 UTC 
Reassigning because of wrong component choice.
Comment 2 scarr 2003-03-21 04:08:00 UTC 
Assigning to Framework.  Please change if this is not the correct comp.
Comment 3 Mathias_Bauer 2003-04-04 13:34:42 UTC 
Lars, would you please examine this in closer detail.
Comment 4 lo 2003-04-08 09:34:17 UTC 
Hi, from your description I can not see where anything such as a link
is involved in making this defect appear. Can you please give some
more details on the fileserver used? (Samba? Version? Special
configuration?)
Might this be a symbolic link on a mounted samb volume?
Please verify whether your problem does still occur with the latest
builds (1.0.2 or 1.1 beta)
Comment 5 lo 2003-05-09 13:25:40 UTC 
This seems to be some problem with the fileserver. I have not been
able to reproduce this with a samba server here. Since there is no
further information there is nothing more I can do.
If there should further information we can still reopen this issue...
Comment 6 lo 2004-12-01 11:02:42 UTC 
no further feedback -> closed