Issue 117301 - EIS "Show tasks in bugzilla" does not work
Summary: EIS "Show tasks in bugzilla" does not work
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Website general issues (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: bernd.eilers
QA Contact: issues@www
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-03-09 14:55 UTC by Stephan Bergmann
Modified: 2012-06-20 20:52 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Stephan Bergmann 2011-03-09 14:55:26 UTC 
For example at <http://tools.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Id=10037&logon=true&OpenOnly=false&TasksInline=false&Section=Tasks> (listing 24 bugster bugs), "Show tasks in bugzilla" goes to <http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?issue_id=114718+116785+116786+116872+116910+116915+116979+116980+116981+116990+117079+117080+117081+117082+117084+117085+117119+117153+117154+117291+117292+117294+117295+117296> which idles around very long and then (at least once for me) starts to produce a listing of all of the 100000+ bugs in the database, eventually crashing the browser.  (Replacing "issue_id" with "quicksearch" in the URL gives the desired result.)
Comment 1 Stephan Bergmann 2011-03-09 15:01:02 UTC 
"listing 24 bugster bugs" should of course read "listing 24 bugzilla bugs"
Comment 2 bernd.eilers 2011-03-12 20:33:41 UTC 
already fixed some time ago
Comment 3 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2012-06-13 12:22:05 UTC 
getting rid of value "enhancement" for field "severity".
For enhancement the field "issue type" shall be used.
Comment 4 Du Jing 2012-06-20 02:23:53 UTC 
now the link can't access,so suggest close the issue
Comment 5 Stephan Bergmann 2012-06-20 20:52:54 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> already fixed some time ago

...and apparently no longer relevant, anyway