Issue 12879 - FreeBSD patches for OOO1.1Beta against oo_644_src_20030412
Summary: FreeBSD patches for OOO1.1Beta against oo_644_src_20030412
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: porting
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Hardware: PC FreeBSD
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 1.1 RC
Assignee: Martin Hollmichel
QA Contact: issues@porting
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-03-31 14:09 UTC by mbr
Modified: 2004-02-07 10:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Filelist of all patches (3.90 KB, text/plain)
2003-03-31 14:12 UTC, mbr
no flags Details
All needed patches (27.33 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-03-31 14:13 UTC, mbr
no flags Details
Again the FreeBSD patches, solenv/unxfbsd.mk did not apply properly. (27.21 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-03-31 15:18 UTC, mbr
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description mbr 2003-03-31 14:09:03 UTC
I'll attach all needed patches and changes for OO1.1Beta2 to get
it running.
Comment 1 mbr 2003-03-31 14:12:34 UTC
Created attachment 5367 [details]
Filelist of all patches
Comment 2 mbr 2003-03-31 14:13:59 UTC
Created attachment 5368 [details]
All needed patches
Comment 3 mbr 2003-03-31 14:15:10 UTC
Descripion of the patches, what they do and why they are here are
available on:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-devel/files/
Comment 4 mbr 2003-03-31 15:18:43 UTC
Created attachment 5379 [details]
Again the FreeBSD patches, solenv/unxfbsd.mk did not apply properly.
Comment 5 foskey 2003-04-01 12:45:10 UTC
Going through the config_office patches:

a)  Why the extra stuff for gcc includes,  why is the simple code not
working.  Can we doing something smarter and simpler.

b) $USE_LINUXJDK	= '@USE_LINUXJDK@'; # Use the Linux JDK.
I have been trying to cut down on the variable so that we can see the
true source for the codes.  The long term strategy is to delete
set_soenv.in (very long term).  Use this instead:
if ("@USE_LINUXJDK@" eq "TRUE") {

c) STAR_SOLARINI - mailnote to see if we can delete variable on tools.
Comment 6 mbr 2003-04-04 08:52:02 UTC
Hi,

a) because we have compilers here from the portsystem -> FreeBSD4.x
   and some from the base-system. Both have different layouts :-(

b) forgotten part. I've completly nuked this, since it is not longer 
  needed

c) what do you mean ?

I'll soom attach the newest dir with lot's of cleanups to the patches.
I'll everything #ifdef freebsd where possible, in the current patchset
there are still some places which may not me 100% correct for
different platforms.

Martin
Comment 7 Martin Hollmichel 2003-04-09 10:56:36 UTC
set target milestone.
Comment 8 Martin Hollmichel 2003-04-09 12:34:00 UTC
mh->mbr: who of us will do the commits ?
Comment 9 foskey 2003-04-09 12:51:01 UTC
Here is the status.  I have the flu so I am not hitting my targets
handing over to someone else.

Applied:

patch-berkeleydb+db-3.2.9.patch
patch-comphelper+util+makefile.mk
patch-connectivity+source+drivers+mozab+makefile.mk
patch-bridges+prj+build.lst
patch-bridges+source+cpp_uno+gcc3_freebsd_intel
patch-bridges+source+jni_uno+jni_uno2java.cxx
patch-cppuhelper+source+makefile.mk

Discussed...

patch-config_office+configure.in
patch-config_office+set_soenv.in

Appears to be superceded:

patch-cppu+inc+uno+lbnames.h

Wont apply to 644:

patch-cppu+prj+build.lst


Comment 10 mbr 2003-04-09 12:56:05 UTC
I'll cvs update to the newest sources and add the latest
patchset this evening.

So please wait until another commit is done.

Martin
Comment 11 Martin Hollmichel 2003-04-11 16:21:08 UTC
reseting prio, since no standard platform.

mh->mbr: I think many of the patches are in now, but I'm sure I still
missed some.
Comment 12 Martin Hollmichel 2003-04-23 13:03:34 UTC
move target milestone to 1.1
Comment 13 Martin Hollmichel 2003-06-26 14:21:48 UTC
please feel to reopen if anything is missing. I think Maho has taken
care of it in the meantime.
Comment 14 Martin Hollmichel 2004-02-07 10:07:27 UTC
mark as verified.
Comment 15 Martin Hollmichel 2004-02-07 10:09:26 UTC
close issue.