Issue 14780 - Some platform specific patches for Linux for S/390
Summary: Some platform specific patches for Linux for S/390
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: porting
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Hardware: Other Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 1.1 RC
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@porting
URL:
Keywords:
: 14778 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-05-23 06:50 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2003-07-30 11:12 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Patch for no-rtti option (653 bytes, patch)
2003-05-23 06:52 UTC, Unknown 		no flags Details | Diff
Patch for boost atomic operations (1.10 KB, patch)
2003-05-23 06:53 UTC, Unknown 		no flags Details | Diff
Patch for additional library linkage. (349 bytes, patch)
2003-05-23 06:54 UTC, Unknown 		no flags Details | Diff
replaces the previous posted file. (1.25 KB, patch)
2003-05-23 11:13 UTC, Unknown 		no flags Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-05-23 06:50:52 UTC 
I have built the OOo 1.1 Beta 2 release on Debian/390 during the last days. It
looks fine so far with the exception of the attached platform specific issues. I
had to switch to jdk 1.4 though. 

The first issue adds -fno-rtti option. I get same unresolved symbols as Kevin on
ppc if I don't use it.
The second issue adds S/390 atomic_inc and atomic_dec implementation for boost.
The third issue adds another library to be linked. This is necessary since jdk
1.4 for S/390 provides now libawt and libjawt libraries and symbols from both
are used.
Comment 1 Unknown 2003-05-23 06:52:37 UTC 
Created attachment 6344 [details]
Patch for no-rtti option
Comment 2 Unknown 2003-05-23 06:53:31 UTC 
Created attachment 6345 [details]
Patch for boost atomic operations
Comment 3 Unknown 2003-05-23 06:54:40 UTC 
Created attachment 6346 [details]
Patch for additional library linkage.
Comment 4 chris 2003-05-23 09:16:15 UTC 
The patches look ok visually, but 501_boost_atomic does not apply to
current beta2 CVS.  Over to you.
Comment 5 Unknown 2003-05-23 11:13:03 UTC 
Created attachment 6351 [details]
replaces the previous posted file.
Comment 6 Unknown 2003-05-23 11:15:29 UTC 
The latest 501_boost_atomic.diff attachment is supposed to replace the
original one. It patches now correctly the boost patch and not the
file directly.
Comment 7 khendricks 2003-05-23 12:54:40 UTC 
Hi Gerhard and Chris, 
 
The boost piece is approved but .. 
the actual boost patch will fail since it was a patch of a patch (notice the double +++ 
lines. 
 
Simpy use dmake create_patch to create a revised boost_1_27_0.patch and then 
commit the entire thing (or ....  and I didn't say this) hand edit the 
boost_1_27_0.patch. 
 
If you run into trouble with this piece and I will update and commit it. 
 
 
Kevin
Comment 8 Unknown 2003-05-24 06:55:18 UTC 
*** Issue 14778 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 9 Unknown 2003-05-24 06:58:12 UTC 
I have commited the changes to cws_srx644_ooo11beta2 and updated 
http://tools.openoffice.org/releases/buglist_1_1_beta2.html .
Comment 10 Unknown 2003-07-30 11:12:39 UTC 
Issue has been verified.