Issue 14845 - Size of .sxc files and loading time
Summary: Size of .sxc files and loading time
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: frank
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords:
: 15088 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-05-25 01:20 UTC by pchretien
Modified: 2003-09-08 16:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description pchretien 2003-05-25 01:20:59 UTC 
From OpenOffice.org 1.0.2, size of large .sxc files has started to grow abnormaly.
A 342 ko file in .xls format was transformed into a 180 ko when saved in .sxc
format with 1.0.1, but into a 397 ko file when saved in .sxc with 1.0.2, 1.0.3.1
and 1.1beta2. 
This happend under Windows 2000 as well as under Linux versions of OpenOffice.org.
At the same time, the time needed to load the .sxc file increased drasticaly,
reaching 35 to 50 seconds when saved from 1.0.2 till 1.1beta2 when the 1.0.1
file was loaded in less than 4 seconds.
Comment 1 sascha.ballach 2003-05-26 08:29:41 UTC 
Hi,

please attach the xls file so I can have a look at this.

Thanks

Sascha
Comment 2 sascha.ballach 2003-05-27 11:02:29 UTC 
Hi,

thank you for the files. I found this bugs some weeks ago also. So it 
is fixed in the build. The file is a little bit bigger, but we save 
now some other aditional information and this should not increase the 
loading time.

Sascha
Comment 3 sascha.ballach 2003-05-27 11:03:09 UTC 
Hi Frank,

please test and verify it.

Thanks
Comment 4 frank 2003-05-27 11:13:11 UTC 
set to fixed
Comment 5 frank 2003-05-27 12:01:58 UTC 
Checked with internal build OOo1.1rc and found fixed.

Frank
Comment 6 frank 2003-05-30 11:12:07 UTC 
*** Issue 15088 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 7 frank 2003-06-02 10:02:07 UTC 
*** Issue 15088 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***