Issue 15504 - editing page steps in dialog editor
Summary: editing page steps in dialog editor
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: udk
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@udk
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-06-11 13:28 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2007-06-18 10:41 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-06-11 13:28:29 UTC 
Using page steps is a very nice feature at runtime. However its pretty hard to 
edit such dialog since all controls overlay each other at edit time.

A proposal is show in the dialog editor a small toolbar that contains a 
checkbox for each used page step in the current dialog editor. By unchecking a 
certain page step you could make these fields invisible in the current editor 
(but still keep them in the editor). That allows you to simulate the different 
page steps and see what the dialog look like at runtime.

It appears that this requires only small changes in the editor code, but 
improves the usability of the dialog editor a lot...
Comment 1 thomas.benisch 2003-06-11 14:54:07 UTC 
In principal this kind of functionality is already included in the
dialog editor.

If you select only the dialog (without controls) you can edit the
step property of the dialog in the property browser.
By default the dialog has a step value of 0, which means that all
controls are shown. If you change the step value of the dialog to 1,
then only controls with a step value of 0 or 1 are shown
(For a control a step value of 0 means that the control is shown on 
all pages.). In that way you already see in design mode each dialog
page seperately.

Therefore I propose to close this task.
Comment 2 Unknown 2003-06-11 15:38:41 UTC 
accepted as already working (if you know how)
Comment 3 kay.ramme 2007-06-18 10:41:22 UTC 
This issue has been "RESOLVED" for quite a time, I assume I can close it ...