Issue 15901 - changes of table content in OO1.0.2 document
Summary: changes of table content in OO1.0.2 document
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 10444
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Hardware: Other Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: h.ilter
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-06-21 22:10 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2003-09-23 16:26 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
here is the table (5.99 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-06-21 22:12 UTC, Unknown 		no flags Details
original table (2.39 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-09-13 19:54 UTC, Unknown 		no flags Details
the false table (10.79 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-09-13 19:55 UTC, Unknown 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-06-21 22:10:52 UTC 
Dates in the first column of a three-column-table will be changed on loading 
this OO-1.0.2-file in OO-1.1beta2. 
 
Please open attatched file in both OO versions. 
 
My system: 
Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable) 
x86 platform 
Kernel 2.4.19 
OpenOffice 1.1beta2
Comment 1 Unknown 2003-06-21 22:12:13 UTC 
Created attachment 7040 [details]
here is the table
Comment 2 Unknown 2003-06-21 22:29:45 UTC 
sorry, i forgot: 
 
the date will be changed in some cases, but everytime to 30.12.99
Comment 3 utomo99 2003-09-12 11:13:26 UTC 
Please explain it more clear about the problem. 

what is the original date ? 
how we can see it ? you say it is changed to 30.12.99. 
what is the original ? how we can see it ?
Comment 4 Unknown 2003-09-12 13:40:31 UTC 
Please load this document into OO 1.0.x (e.g. OO 1.0.3) and you will
see original dates. Unforunately I havn't actually installed this
Version of OO on my System.
Comment 5 utomo99 2003-09-13 05:29:48 UTC 
sorry I already uninstalled 1.0.3. 

I think somebody can try this, or we can close this, because 1.1 will
be final soon ?
Comment 6 Unknown 2003-09-13 19:54:22 UTC 
Created attachment 9285 [details]
original table
Comment 7 Unknown 2003-09-13 19:55:33 UTC 
Created attachment 9286 [details]
the false table
Comment 8 Unknown 2003-09-13 19:57:52 UTC 
What?
You want to close this bug despite this isn't solved yet?
Congratulation, you have found the easiest way to solve this problem!

I have reinstalled OO1.0.3 and give you the needed information, but
I'm not sure whether anybody is interested in solving this bug. :-(

Three mounths...
Comment 9 rblackeagle 2003-09-13 22:40:50 UTC 
Who wants to close it?  Any fixes will appear in later releases.  If
it appears in 1.1RC4, it remains a bug.  If it doesn't, it's fixed. 
That's what the bug reports are for.  Bugs in early releases are bugs
in early releases, but the development team works on changes to
improve the system and correct bugs.  Their results will be in future
releases.
Comment 10 mdevenish 2003-09-20 17:28:22 UTC 
This seems to be a bug in the number recognition and number format
recognition within tables, when using user-defined formats.
In OOo 1.0.2 (GNU/Linux) the dates appear as intended, using a
user-defined date format of DD.MM.YY.
When the same file is opened in OOo 1.1 Beta, the user-defined date
format is correct, however some of the dates have been converted to be
30.12.99, which is the sample date in the number format dialog box.
Opening the file again in OOo 1.1 RC4, the user-defined date format is
lost (defaulting to DD/MM/YY) and some of the dates (the same ones as
in 1.1 Beta) are converted to the sample date of 30/12/99.
Comment 11 jack.warchold 2003-09-23 16:24:51 UTC 
this is duplicated to the following issue

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 10444 ***
Comment 12 jack.warchold 2003-09-23 16:26:04 UTC 
duplicate -> closed