Issue 16240 - [calc] column headers lost in sorting when column name is in Hebrew
Summary: [calc] column headers lost in sorting when column name is in Hebrew
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 16239
Alias: None
Product: Internationalization
Classification: Code
Component: BiDi (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: niklas.nebel
QA Contact: issues@l10n
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-06-30 12:34 UTC by sforbes
Modified: 2003-08-14 13:29 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
calc file with all column names in english (10.79 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-06-30 12:35 UTC, sforbes
no flags Details
same file- with one of the column names changed to Hebrew (10.94 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-06-30 12:35 UTC, sforbes
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description sforbes 2003-06-30 12:34:58 UTC
When sorting by a column that has a Hebrew name- the column name is lost and
replaced by the first item after the sort.

To repro:

1. open attached calc file, relationships.sxc
2. click on the top left corner of the file, to select the full sheet.
3. go to date--sort, and sort the sheet by column b.
4. See that the column name is still present
5. revert back to the saved file

6. change the name of column b to a Hebrew name (or open attached file
relationships-h.sxc where I have already changed that for you)
7. repeat steps 2-3 from above
8. see that unlike in step 4, the solumn name is now lost and replaced by the
first item after the sort
Comment 1 sforbes 2003-06-30 12:35:24 UTC
Created attachment 7249 [details]
calc file with all column names in english
Comment 2 sforbes 2003-06-30 12:35:57 UTC
Created attachment 7250 [details]
same file- with one of the column names changed to Hebrew
Comment 3 Dieter.Loeschky 2003-08-14 13:15:33 UTC
DL->NN: Could you please takeover?
Comment 4 niklas.nebel 2003-08-14 13:28:49 UTC
This is the same as 16239. If the first row isn't recognized as
headers (which I can't reproduce), it is included in the data and
might get sorted to somewhere else.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 16239 ***
Comment 5 niklas.nebel 2003-08-14 13:29:13 UTC
closing duplicate.