Issue 18654 - page preview differs to edit view
Summary: page preview differs to edit view
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 3910
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC3
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: jack.warchold
QA Contact: issues@sw
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Reported: 2003-08-25 22:34 UTC by shivan
Modified: 2003-09-12 14:01 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

file with some blank pages only in page preview (11.48 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-08-25 22:35 UTC, shivan
no flags Details
Page preview (14.88 KB, image/png)
2003-09-11 19:27 UTC, shivan
no flags Details
the same document while editing (12.21 KB, image/png)
2003-09-11 19:28 UTC, shivan
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description shivan 2003-08-25 22:34:44 UTC
in the page preview OOo adds some empty pages, but not in edit mode ?!
Especially on an index. When I delete the index and reinsert it with some line 
breaks, it works. See attached document.
Comment 1 shivan 2003-08-25 22:35:47 UTC
Created attachment 8750 [details]
file with some blank pages only in page preview
Comment 2 jack.warchold 2003-09-11 19:12:15 UTC
i can not reproduce this with OOo1.1RC4

reassigned to jw
Comment 3 jack.warchold 2003-09-11 19:12:34 UTC
set to WFM
Comment 4 shivan 2003-09-11 19:27:41 UTC
Created attachment 9210 [details]
Page preview
Comment 5 shivan 2003-09-11 19:28:30 UTC
Created attachment 9211 [details]
the same document while editing
Comment 6 shivan 2003-09-11 19:30:21 UTC
I tried it in RC4 german, and I got the same. (uninstalled OOo RC3 
downloaded and installed
Comment 7 utomo99 2003-09-12 04:31:52 UTC
I can reproduce this on 1.1 RC 4 Win XP. 

in page preview the second page is blank page. 
so It is a bugs
Comment 8 lohmaier 2003-09-12 13:59:34 UTC
it's not a bug, but a feature (but one that should be turned of in the
future :-), please see issue 3910
Comment 9 lohmaier 2003-09-12 14:00:19 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 3910 ***
Comment 10 lohmaier 2003-09-12 14:01:00 UTC
see issue 3910 for a detailed explanation...