Issue 18792 - caret placed wrong after undo and redo with deleted footnotes
Summary: caret placed wrong after undo and redo with deleted footnotes
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC4
Hardware: PC All
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
Depends on:
Reported: 2003-08-28 23:39 UTC by lars
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description lars 2003-08-28 23:39:07 UTC
caret placed wrong after undo and redo with deleted footnotes:

1. open Writer
2. type fffg
3. insert footnte
4. type ss as footnote
5. click with mouse in first line of page after the footnote symbol so that 
caret is behind the footnote symbol
6. backspace 2 times, so delete footnote and g
7. undo twice (footnote symbol is highlighted now)
8. redo once: caret is between last f and g :  defect !
Comment 1 jack.warchold 2003-09-11 15:12:02 UTC
reproduced on OOo1.1RC4
set Prio to P4
set taget to OOo later
set os to all
sert version to OOo1.1RC4
reassigned to fme
set status to new
Comment 2 ace_dent 2008-05-16 02:38:44 UTC Issue Tracker - Feedback Request.

The Issue you raised has the status 'New' pending further action, but has not
been updated within the last 4 years. Please consider re-testing with one of the
latest versions of OOo, as the problem(s) may have already been addressed.
Either use the recent stable version:
or consider trying the new OOo 3 BETA (still in testing):
Please report back the outcome so this Issue may be Closed or Progressed as
necessary - otherwise it may be Resolved as Invalid in the future. You may also
wish to search for (and note) any duplicates of this Issue that may have
advanced further by checking the Issue Tracker:
Many thanks,
Cleaning-up and Closing old Issues as part of:
~ The Grand Bug Squash, pre v3 ~
Comment 3 lars 2008-05-17 19:46:24 UTC
issue still valid as per OOo 3.0 Beta m2.

let's hope this is an independant defect not concerning any general undo system 
code or counter, offsets or pointers (here's a +-1 counter error)