Issue 1993 - File Sharing: Secure, automizable, per-project way of uploading large batches of files
Summary: File Sharing: Secure, automizable, per-project way of uploading large batches...
Status: CLOSED WONT_FIX
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Website general issues (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P2 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: CEE Consid-future
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@www
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-10-22 13:29 UTC by jsc
Modified: 2009-07-12 18:58 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description jsc 2001-10-22 13:29:50 UTC
It would be helpful to have regions on the server which will be easy accesible
using 'scp'. This is for generated output which should be updated very
frequently (eg. IDL reference dokumentation). For this kind of generated output
it  is to overspaced to use cvs for each update.
Comment 1 ooo 2001-10-23 15:30:02 UTC
reassigned
Comment 2 lsuarezpotts 2001-10-24 00:16:42 UTC
I am reassigning this issue to MT, who is our lead engineer for 
Ooo.
-louis
Comment 3 malte_timmermann 2001-10-24 16:45:25 UTC
Wrong MT...
Comment 4 lsuarezpotts 2001-10-27 05:44:51 UTC
reassigning to support
Comment 5 Unknown 2001-11-01 18:45:54 UTC
Hi,

We will discuss the possibility internally. There is a designated
upload section, but if I understand correctly you would also like to
be able to copy files down from the server and possibly remove old
files?

Thank you
Kat 
Comment 6 Unknown 2001-11-09 19:08:46 UTC
Without further details of the extent of fuctionality it is difficult
to proceed.  Are the Files or Documentation sections available within
each project's resources not sufficient for this use?

Thank you
Kat
Comment 7 ooo 2001-11-12 11:50:41 UTC
Sorry,  I missed this question somehow.  What we need, is an area
which is visible in the web (by http) but not within the CVS area. 
The files area might be usefule, if we could use scp to copy files to
it.  Using a web form is not a good option, because we need to copy
thausands of files (by a script).
Comment 8 Unknown 2001-11-22 00:11:02 UTC
There has been some discussion on this subject, but no conclusions
yet. The request is being tracked internally as pcn6627.

Thank you
Kat
Comment 9 Unknown 2002-01-15 18:49:02 UTC
Moving this to the www component, and reassigning to support@ so I can
look at it.
Comment 10 Unknown 2002-01-15 19:18:56 UTC
We are currently in the planning phase of an enhancement called "File
Sharing: Secure, automizable, per-project way of uploading large
batches of files."  I think this is really the same request, so I'm
changing the summary to reflect that.  The internal issue number for
this is PCN6827, and it's planned for our next major release
(code-name Danube).
Comment 11 lsuarezpotts 2002-08-21 00:07:38 UTC
This enhancement is targeted for the Danube release of SourceCast.
During the upgrade to that release we can verify this issue or reopen
if necessary.
Comment 12 Frank Schönheit 2003-02-11 14:59:06 UTC
Right now, I have the problem that I would like to restrucure the "web
presence" of the DBA project (it urgently needs this :). This means
(possibly) renaming of files, (certainly) renaming of directories, and
moving files. All of this is up to impossible with the current
architecture, where I would need to cvs remove/add all the affected files.

It would be great if such a scenario could be targeted with this
issue, too. It's not only about a large number of files (what the
current subject suggests), but it's also about small changes which are
simply ineffecient when done with CVS.

I think an FTP area (all webspace providers I know offer this for the
homepages they host) would be the best solution. It would be easiest
to work on a (local) directory/file structure which represents the web
presence of a project, and then sync this with the web server, without
hassling with dozens of cvs commands.

In this course, it would be interesting to know what is the time frame
for Danube? :)
Comment 13 stx123 2004-03-22 16:09:40 UTC
For technical reasons we have to move the issue to another subcomponent tan 'www'.
Sorry for bothering you with this generated notification message. There is no
need for any action from yor side.
Thanks for your understanding, Stefan
Comment 14 stx123 2006-04-14 01:35:34 UTC
According to the status whiteboard entry this issue is planned or targeted for
Danube.
In preparation of the upgrade we should see a confirmation that the issues will
be resolved in CEE 3.5.1.
Please set the target milestone accordingly.
Comment 15 Unknown 2006-04-17 21:28:43 UTC
Got pushed for consideration in later releases.
Comment 16 Unknown 2006-12-01 07:39:22 UTC
This issue has been considered for a future release . Moving this issue into the
resolved later queue .
Comment 17 Unknown 2007-03-07 17:46:40 UTC
To CRM .
Comment 18 Unknown 2007-03-07 17:47:21 UTC
TO CRM
Comment 19 Unknown 2009-01-16 14:54:24 UTC
.
Comment 20 Unknown 2009-01-16 14:58:54 UTC
After careful review, we found this to be a custom request to address your
specific business requirement. We have reviewed all future roadmaps,
functionality, and options but did not find an area this request applied to
CollabNet's future goals.

If you feel you would like this request to be considered/implemented, please
forward your suggestions to our Services team.

Regards,
Karishma
CollabNet Support
Comment 21 Mechtilde 2009-07-12 18:58:16 UTC
wontfixed -> closed