Issue 20681 - the same doc files view correct by oo-1.0.3 and view distorted by oo-1.1
Summary: the same doc files view correct by oo-1.0.3 and view distorted by oo-1.1
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: ulf.stroehler
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL: http://optimum2.mii.lt/~jonas2
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-04 03:03 UTC by mockus
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:43 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
original doc file 'magister.doc, (19.00 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-10-04 03:05 UTC, mockus 		no flags Details
gif image obtained by xv using oo-1.1 to view original 'magister.doc' (2.89 KB, image/gif)
2003-10-04 03:09 UTC, mockus 		no flags Details
gif image obtained by xv using oo-1.0 to view original 'magister.doc' (6.23 KB, image/gif)
2003-10-04 03:11 UTC, mockus 		no flags Details
html file obtained converting original 'magister.doc' by both oo-1.0 and oo-1.1 (2.01 KB, text/html)
2003-10-04 03:14 UTC, mockus 		no flags Details
View in 1.1/Linux on my computer (25.16 KB, image/png)
2003-10-04 06:33 UTC, askoning 		no flags Details
wiew of the doc file by oo-1.1 depends on hardware, here is p3 128 MB 40 Gb (6.56 KB, image/gif)
2003-10-06 06:10 UTC, mockus 		no flags Details
distorted wiew of doc file by oo-1.1 using p4 1000MB 160 Gb and the same linux rh-9 (2.89 KB, image/gif)
2003-10-06 06:16 UTC, mockus 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description mockus 2003-10-04 03:03:12 UTC 
the same doc files view correct by oo-1.0.3 and view distorted by oo-1.1
they are converted correctly to txt and html in the both cases
Comment 1 mockus 2003-10-04 03:05:40 UTC 
Created attachment 9980 [details]
original doc file 'magister.doc,
Comment 2 mockus 2003-10-04 03:09:23 UTC 
Created attachment 9981 [details]
gif image obtained by xv using oo-1.1 to view original 'magister.doc'
Comment 3 mockus 2003-10-04 03:11:52 UTC 
Created attachment 9982 [details]
gif image obtained by xv using oo-1.0 to view original 'magister.doc'
Comment 4 mockus 2003-10-04 03:14:20 UTC 
Created attachment 9983 [details]
html file obtained converting original 'magister.doc' by both oo-1.0 and oo-1.1
Comment 5 utomo99 2003-10-04 05:09:21 UTC 
I Can Not Reproduce the problem in OpenOffice 1.1,MS Office XP Pro
Sp2, Win Xp Pro.

But reporter using Linux
Comment 6 askoning 2003-10-04 06:30:26 UTC 
Cannot reproduce in 1.1/Linux. File magister-11-askoning.png with view
in my 1.1 attached.
Comment 7 askoning 2003-10-04 06:33:14 UTC 
Created attachment 9987 [details]
View in 1.1/Linux on my computer
Comment 8 mockus 2003-10-06 06:10:25 UTC 
Created attachment 10036 [details]
wiew of the doc file by oo-1.1 depends on hardware, here is p3 128 MB 40 Gb
Comment 9 mockus 2003-10-06 06:16:47 UTC 
Created attachment 10037 [details]
distorted wiew of  doc file by oo-1.1 using p4 1000MB 160 Gb and the same linux rh-9
Comment 10 mci 2003-10-08 07:31:56 UTC 
reassigned to mru
Comment 11 michael.ruess 2003-10-09 08:25:09 UTC 
MRU->US: Looks like a font replacement problem on Linux. Sounds like a
regression, should be done for 1.1.1.
Comment 12 ulf.stroehler 2003-11-07 17:03:24 UTC 
Tested the bugdoc on SuSE Linux and RH9. SuSE displays the document
perfect. RH9 has minor problems with some latin 2 characters. I'd
suggest to do a font replacement to map "Times" to "Nimbus Roman No9
L".  Then also RH9 displays the document perfect. 

But I never encounterd a behaviour like shown in the screenshot.

=>"WORKSFORME"

@submitter: pls. state what Linux you are using. Thanks.
Comment 13 ulf.stroehler 2003-11-13 16:27:48 UTC 
Closing Issue; because:

we had a deeper look at this issue and were able to reproduce it with
a RedHat 7.2.
Additionally we found out that for the text in question "ult1mo Times
New Roman, bold" was used, which claimed to be scalable.
But this font is obviously corrupted as also xfontsel failed to
display the font.