Issue 21911 - wrong numbering if files share list numbering in master document
Summary: wrong numbering if files share list numbering in master document
Status: ACCEPTED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC5
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial with 7 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-30 15:04 UTC by duckworth
Modified: 2017-05-20 11:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description duckworth 2003-10-30 15:04:34 UTC 
OpenOffice.org1.1.0 
* Create a file (test-1.sxw) containing a numbered list (I made one containing a 
list of 3 items, 3 bullets, and another bulleted list of 3 items) 
1. a 
2. b 
3. c 
* Copy test-1.sxw to test-2.sxw and test-3.sxw 
* Create a master document containing all three documents 
* The list numbering in one document is incorrect: 
  1,2,3 ; 1,2,3; 4,5,6 
(4,5,6 is incorrect) 
 
(This is not good when you have a 200 page document).  Sometimes a "update 
section" makes the lists number themselves correctly.  It seems that the error can 
shift between documents (a race condition).  I suspect that the lists are given the 
same name in different documents.  A possibly related problem is that bullets 
can change into numbered lists spontaneously in the master document.
Comment 1 mci 2003-12-17 13:11:06 UTC 
reassigned to mci
Comment 2 mci 2003-12-17 13:49:49 UTC 
reassigned to hbrinkm

Hi hb,

I think this is something for you...

I tried this on Solaris and there were some versions of numbering through the 
masterdocument...
I made a small document with numbering and bullets and copied it to 3 files
(1.sxw, 2.sxw, 3.sxw):
1. a
2. b
3. c
*  d
*  e
*  f

example: 
after "update all" I got:
1. a
2. b
3. c
*  d
*  e
*  f
4. a
5. b
6. c
*  d
*  e
*  f
1. a
2. b
3. c
*  d
*  e
*  f

If this isn't anything for you, please dispatch, thanks...
Comment 3 openoffice 2004-02-04 10:47:48 UTC 
estimated effort
Comment 4 openoffice 2004-02-04 10:54:09 UTC 
accepted
Comment 5 openoffice 2004-04-29 16:16:18 UTC 
retargeted
Comment 6 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:19:43 UTC 
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".