Issue 22359 - Numbering (bullets): Consecutive numbering unchecked for presets on Options tab
Summary: Numbering (bullets): Consecutive numbering unchecked for presets on Options tab
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: h.ilter
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: needmoreinfo, oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-11-11 21:48 UTC by smsanders
Modified: 2004-02-04 16:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description smsanders 2003-11-11 21:48:04 UTC 
In the Numbering/Bullets dialog, if you select the Numbering type tab, then
select a preset, then select the Options tab, you'll find most the settings for
that preset correctly filled in, but the Consecutive numbering option will be
unchecked, even though the numbering/bullets will be consecutive when you begin
to enter data in the text edit area, whether you press OK on a presets tab or
the Options tab with that option unchecked.
Comment 1 guido.pinkernell 2004-02-01 13:51:24 UTC 
I can't confirm this.

Maybe that's due to a misunderstanding of the setting "consecutive numbering":
_Any_ numbered list will be consecutive within the same level. I.e.:

1. item 1
   1.1 subitem 1.1
   1.2 subitem 1.2
2. item 2
etc

However, when enabling Consecutive Numbering in the settings, this will result 
in the list above being changed to:
1. item 1
   2. subitem 1.1
   3. subitem 1.2
4. item 2

Which, obviously, shouldn't be enabled by default.

Could you please confirm whether this resolves your problem?
Comment 2 smsanders 2004-02-03 22:50:08 UTC 
Yes, it does. Coupled with my previous bug report (22360: Numbering/Bullets
previews invalid, re: preview shows all levels), it appeared to me as though it
would (in preview, but not actually, I had thought) affect the top level only.

Thanks.
Comment 3 guido.pinkernell 2004-02-04 16:57:26 UTC 
.