Issue 23274 - ezmlm/qmail drops users when html messages are rejected
Summary: ezmlm/qmail drops users when html messages are rejected
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Mailing lists (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P2 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: stx123
QA Contact: issues@www
URL:
Keywords:
: 23273 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-12-07 23:04 UTC by grsingleton
Modified: 2004-05-30 11:12 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description grsingleton 2003-12-07 23:04:50 UTC
EZMLM drops users when messages are rejected for containing html. Sometimes
silently and other times because it cannot or won't deal with the fact that some
sites protect themselves against html formatted emails. For example, today my
system rejected a message from ezml because it contained html. Ezmlm then sent a
message to the effect that my name would be dropped because of the fact I will
not allow html formatted email on my system.

Here is the message I got threatening loss of my account:

Return-Path:
       
<educ-return-warn-1070815362.kmoliejgifhamifkhcmm-gerry=pathtech.org@marketing.openoffice.org>
Received: from openoffice.org (s002.sfo.collab.net [64.125.133.202]) by
        pathtech.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id hB7GghJc012037 for
        <gerry@pathtech.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:42:44 -0500
Received: (qmail 14466 invoked by uid 5302); 7 Dec 2003 16:42:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact educ-help@marketing.openoffice.org; run by ezmlm
Date: 7 Dec 2003 16:42:43 -0000
Message-ID: <1070815363.14460.ezmlm-warn@marketing.openoffice.org>
From: educ-help@marketing.openoffice.org
To: gerry@pathtech.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: ezmlm warning
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.33 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
Status:   
X-Evolution-Source: pop://gerry@mail.pathtech.org
Mime-Version: 1.0

Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
educ@marketing.openoffice.org mailing list.


Messages to you from the educ mailing list seem to
have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce
message I received.

If this message bounces too, I will send you a probe. If the probe bounces,
I will remove your address from the educ mailing list,
without further notice.


I've kept a list of which messages from the educ mailing list have 
bounced from your address.

Copies of these messages may be in the archive.
To retrieve a set of messages 123-145 (a maximum of 100 per request),
send an empty message to:
   <educ-get.123_145@marketing.openoffice.org>

To receive a subject and author list for the last 100 or so messages,
send an empty message to:
   <educ-index@marketing.openoffice.org>

Here are the message numbers:

   317

--- Enclosed is a copy of the bounce message I received.

Return-Path: <>
Received: (qmail 8702 invoked for bounce); 25 Nov 2003 22:43:54 -0000
Date: 25 Nov 2003 22:43:54 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@openoffice.org
To: educ-return-317-@marketing.openoffice.org
Subject: failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at openoffice.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<gerry@pathtech.org>:
205.189.41.5 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 HTML messages not allowed on this server

This is NOT good. I have been dropped to many times for this and other problems
with the ezmlm/qmail at openoffice.org
Comment 1 stx123 2003-12-16 10:09:33 UTC
Hi Gerry,
first of all I can reassure you that you won't loose your account but only the
subscription to a mailing list.
My understanding of the explanation is that the mailing list manager ezmlm sends
the notification and will unsubscribe someone if the notification bounces and
another probe.
It's unlikely that you have been unsubscribed because of rejecting HTML messages.
Greetings, Stefan
Comment 2 grsingleton 2003-12-16 13:08:05 UTC
Stefan, Sorry you are wrong. ezmlm does exactly as shown. What's worse is it
does in silently in most cases. I gather from your response that you are locked
into using this defective software and cannot evaluate software that is
reasonable. I see that you also employ qmail as the MTA which brings up the
question, do you also employ djbdns? Please regard this issue as real and an
indication that the software you defend is defective and should only be used for
handling home mailing lists rather than enterprise emailing lists.

I apologize for using the word account when I meant subscription. But you know
this. I see no reason that anyone should be UNSUBSCRIBED because of flakey
software on the server. It is the silent unsubscribing that needs to be examined
more so than this example.  If you are the person that chose this software, I
highly recommend that you re-evaluate your position and relationship with the
author.
Comment 3 stx123 2003-12-16 21:00:41 UTC
reassigning
Comment 4 stx123 2003-12-16 21:01:24 UTC
reassign
Comment 5 stx123 2003-12-16 21:46:57 UTC
Hi Gerry,
I agree that no subscriber should be unsubscribed without reason - esp. not
silently. But let's stick in this issue with the defect you described. I'm aware
of issue 23273 you filed.
I'm not able and willing to discuss the selection of the software.
Reading the content of the ezmlm notification I still think that it's unlikely -
not impossible - that subscribers are unsubscribed because of the rejection of
HTML messages. The probes would be accepted and the subscription continued.

But instead of argueing I would like to track down and reproduce the problem you
mentioned when you filed this issue.

Please let me know, if you are interested.
Greetings, Stefan
Comment 6 grsingleton 2003-12-16 21:59:51 UTC
I am willing to help. I am certain there will be others as well. BTW, the html
rejection is the only one I was able to catch and report. All others resulted in
unsubscribing without warning. I understand about not wishing to discuss the
software but I wish it weren't so.
Comment 7 stx123 2003-12-17 21:19:32 UTC
I would like to create a mailing list in the project "test".
Then subscribe you and send a message in plain test, then with HTML.
And we'll see...
May I flood your mailbox?
Comment 8 grsingleton 2003-12-17 22:23:15 UTC
Yes you may. My system rejects if you are in a dnsbl, attach a virus or other
unacceptable thing. So try them too. Please let me know when you are done I have
mods to make to my configuration. 
Comment 9 grsingleton 2004-01-08 18:15:30 UTC
Confirmed. I was dropped silently from the marketing lists to which I have been
subscribed for forever. No warning, no nothing. This occurred sometime after Dec
31, 2003 at 16h44. I suggest that you attach mimedefang or similar filter to
qmail such as http://ngm.id.au/checkhab
Comment 10 Rainer Bielefeld 2004-02-22 16:38:14 UTC
I've got similar messages, but I do not see clearly the reasons.

Funny thing: I have subscribed users@de.openoffice.org, dev@qa.openoffice.org,
but I got warning messages concerning lists  users-help@de.openoffice.org,
dev-help@qa.openoffice.org.

It seems that I've been droppend, I can no longer send emails to
dev@qa.openoffice.org

Rainer
Comment 11 Rainer Bielefeld 2004-02-23 09:21:52 UTC
I was wrong! I have not been dropped, and I can send emails to [qa-dev]. _My_
problem was that I sent an amail with subject "Test" to [qa-dev], and it seems,
that emails with that subject will be rejected:
> eporting-MTA: dns; mailc0923.dte2k.de
> 
> Final-Recipient: RFC822; dev@qa.openoffice.org Action: failed 
> Status: 5.7.1 X-Supplementary-Info: <mailc0910.dte2k.de #5.7.1
> smtp;550 5.7.1 "Test"... W32.Novarg.A signature in Subject
> rejected> X-Display-Name: dev@qa.openoffice.org

So I can leave this issue no longer as "NEW. Grsingleton, please reopen, if the
"drop problem" still is actual for you! 

Rainer

Comment 12 bernd.eilers 2004-02-25 19:14:05 UTC
*** Issue 23273 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 13 Rainer Bielefeld 2004-05-30 11:12:36 UTC
no objections to WFM, so I close this issue