Issue 23631 - filtering member lists uses invisible data
Summary: filtering member lists uses invisible data
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Website general issues (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@www
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-12-17 15:14 UTC by Frank Schönheit
Modified: 2004-08-19 12:25 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Frank Schönheit 2003-12-17 15:14:54 UTC
filtering member lists of projects (e.g.
http://qa.openoffice.org/servlets/ProjectMemberList) seems to use (internally)
data which in no way is visible to the web site user.
E.g., filter the member list of the QA project (link above) for "fs". This gives
you exactly one entry:
   User     Real name   Roles        Assigned issues
   hde      hde         Developer    View issues

There is no "fs" in this list at all. To the site user, this looks as if the
search function is unreliable - I wouldn't believe it when I already had an
impression that it lied to me ...

(well, hde in real life is "Helge Delfs". Is it possivle that internally, the
real names for the users still exist - though they vanished from OOo with the
site upgrade -, and are still used for the search?)
Comment 1 Unknown 2003-12-18 16:52:00 UTC
FS: Thanks for the information. I've filed an internal task for our Community
Managers to review the information. I'll update this issue when my internal one
has been updated. (adding Louis to the cc list)
Comment 2 lsuarezpotts 2003-12-18 18:01:45 UTC
confirming.  Frank, I've raised the issue's prominence.  The default search on OOo should use login 
names. 
Louis
Comment 3 Frank Schönheit 2003-12-19 10:13:09 UTC
oh, well, the default search should use real names, and OOo should display real
names. sorry, couldn't resist :)
Comment 4 Unknown 2004-02-03 23:07:05 UTC
This isssue is currently being researched and implemented by all parites
involved.  We are currently working on implementing a solution for this, but at
this time I have no updates. I will update this issue in the near future.
Comment 5 Unknown 2004-02-05 12:08:27 UTC
Fs 

Currently the Issue seems to be resolved.

Steps

1. Open link http://qa.openoffice.org/servlets/ProjectMemberList
2. In 'Filter the List' option Enter 'fs' & click 'Filter'

Result
User    Real      Name      Roles     Assigned issues 
fs       fs     Developer    View        issues  
fst      fst    Developer    View        issues  
hde      hde    Developer    View        issues  


The hde is also appear because the search also includes email id search & in 
the email id the 'fs ' letter seqeunce is present.

the email id search just uses characters set ie if u give keywords "ert" it 
would search the character set "ert" in all email id & will display user names 
of all user with email id which has the charset 'ert'

Closing issue as Resolved Fixed

-Mohan

Comment 6 Frank Schönheit 2004-02-05 12:42:35 UTC
sorry, but this is weird.

The subject of this issue is
  filtering member lists uses invisible data
. I don't see how this has changed. I understand that the mail address which
"hde" is registered with contains an "fs" (since his real world address is
"helge dot delfs at sun dot com"), but that's not the point.

The point is: I do a search in a database, and get results which seem not to be
related to the search term, since the displayed result does not *contain* the
search term.
I heavily doubt that anybody expects the real-world email addresses to be
searched - those addresses have no relevance in OOo, and of most users, you do
not even know it - since they usually only appear as <login>@openoffice.org -,
so it doesn't make sense to look for them.

Even more: The behaviour you described implies that I can search for all Sun
employess by just looking up "sun.com" in the member lists. You could even call
this is privacy issue - no real names are allowed, but searching for the email
addresses is?

So, including the real world email address in the search is weird.
Comment 7 Unknown 2004-02-06 04:15:44 UTC
Hi Fs,

I completely agree with your views. I forward your opinions to the engineering 
Department & will post further updates as & when they come

Cheers
-Mohan
Comment 8 Unknown 2004-04-05 07:15:38 UTC
Awaiting for the engineers response.
Comment 9 Unknown 2004-05-01 00:24:50 UTC
Hi FS,

The last update I see here is that this is supposed to be fixed by implementing
the DRPL checking by SOW, but it is on hold right now.

Here is the update:

the "DRPL checking" SOW is on hold due to Sun budget restraints.  So, 
this probably won't be in place for a few more months at least.  Drew Thomas is 
tracking this closely with Chris Chelene from Sun. 

Let me know how to best proceed from here.
Eric
Comment 10 Frank Schönheit 2004-05-03 07:55:30 UTC
Whatever "DRPL checking by SOW" is meant to be ....

Well, I can't tell collab.net how to handle issues with their products, can I? I
described the issue, I described what I think is the severity of the issue, and
it's up to collab.net to decide what to do with it, influenced by whatever
constraints there are. This may be "won't fix because" over "fixing now" to
"fixint later" ...
Comment 11 Unknown 2004-05-03 19:29:08 UTC
I am checking with Drew to find out where stand here.
Eric
Comment 12 Unknown 2004-08-19 11:53:18 UTC
This issue will be superceded by the DRPL (denied restricted parties list, 
please refer to OOo internal mgmt for more information on this) implementation 
for which we are awaiting Sun's timeframe to proceed.  That work will make this 
issue invalid.
Comment 13 Frank Schönheit 2004-08-19 12:25:16 UTC
Quite unorthodox to resolve an issue as INVALID because *somewhere in the
future*, it won't be an issue anymore. If I'd do this with a "normal" OOo issue,
i'd be told "Don't alienate the community!" - and rightfully so.
<sarcasm>Sometimes I wish I could get rid of my own issues equally easily.</sarcasm>

<sigh/>
Closing issue.