Issue 24372 - Individual per Tab Percent View
Summary: Individual per Tab Percent View
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: frank
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords:
: 75766 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-14 00:01 UTC by danweis
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:14 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Testcase Specification (7.85 KB, text/html)
2007-11-16 14:19 UTC, frank 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description danweis 2004-01-14 00:01:18 UTC 
The view magnification in all of the "sheets" (tabs) are the same. If you change
one, they all change. It would be nice to have different magnification in each
tab, and have them remembered, ala Excel. Like 75% in one and 90% in another and
100% in the third one. Having a simple data set in one, and a complex (big) set
in another makes it hard to view when switching back and forth.
Comment 1 frank 2004-01-14 14:12:26 UTC 
Hi Bettina,

maybe a good idea also for OOo2.0

Frank
Comment 2 niklas.nebel 2007-11-12 13:49:54 UTC 
I take it.
Comment 3 niklas.nebel 2007-11-12 13:50:27 UTC 
Done on CWS "sheetzoom".
Comment 4 niklas.nebel 2007-11-13 12:01:43 UTC 
Back to QA for verification.
Comment 5 frank 2007-11-16 14:19:13 UTC 
Created attachment 49694 [details]
Testcase Specification
Comment 6 frank 2007-11-16 14:19:46 UTC 
found fixed on cws sheetzoom
Comment 7 frank 2007-11-16 14:20:13 UTC 
wrong radio button
Comment 8 frank 2007-11-16 14:23:21 UTC 
fixed
Comment 9 frank 2007-11-16 14:23:48 UTC 
and verified
Comment 10 frank 2007-12-11 14:55:13 UTC 
found integrated on master m239 using Linux, Solaris and Windows build
Comment 11 kpalagin 2008-02-26 18:46:48 UTC 
*** Issue 75766 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***