Issue 2466 - Allow background as text
Summary: Allow background as text
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 22405
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: formatting (show other issues)
Version: 641
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial with 2 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: requirements
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: ms_interoperability, rfe_eval_ok
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-12-06 13:29 UTC by osavill
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description osavill 2001-12-06 13:29:07 UTC 
On the page attributes you have the option to set the Background as Graphic or Colour. Why not 
allow Text in one or more text boxes. This would allow M$ Word Watermarks to be imported.
Comment 1 stefan.baltzer 2001-12-07 09:34:45 UTC 
Reassigned to Falko.
Comment 2 falko.tesch 2002-01-02 10:40:08 UTC 
This issue is re-assigned to Christian Jansen for further evaluation.
Comment 3 christian.jansen 2002-01-08 10:46:21 UTC 
Due to the fact, that it is a filter issue. Back to you.
Comment 4 falko.tesch 2002-01-09 10:12:01 UTC 
Well, right. We should have the ability of Watermarks in genaral. I agree!
Comment 5 falko.tesch 2003-09-11 15:51:28 UTC 
Re-assigned
Comment 6 falko.tesch 2003-09-11 15:51:53 UTC 
Started
Comment 7 osavill 2003-09-15 17:15:18 UTC 
Lots of reassigning and agreement. Any movement on this one. Thanks
Comment 8 sgautier.ooo 2004-09-06 17:33:33 UTC 
reassigning & adding keywords according to new RFE process - sophie
Comment 9 lohmaier 2004-10-23 14:52:42 UTC 
A younger issue 22405 has more votes than this one, so I keep the other one and
mark this issue as duplicate. Please don't forget to transfer your vote.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 22405 ***
Comment 10 lohmaier 2004-10-23 14:53:52 UTC 
closing issue.
@udopracht: please don't forget to move your vote to issue 22405