Issue 24958 - HTML Editing: no <P> on <LI> items
Summary: HTML Editing: no <P> on <LI> items
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 680m20
Hardware: All All
: P5 (lowest) Trivial with 2 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
Depends on:
Reported: 2004-01-31 08:08 UTC by joeclarkia
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:41 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description joeclarkia 2004-01-31 08:08:31 UTC
Currently, OOO puts <LI> text within <P></P> tags, adding an extra line to 
each item in a bulleted list.  Is this standard?  I personally would prefer it 
without the <P> tags (for a list that takes up less screen space).
Comment 1 mci 2004-02-06 08:40:50 UTC
set target...
Comment 2 mci 2004-02-09 07:34:33 UTC
reassigned to bh
Comment 3 joeclarkia 2005-04-20 15:50:53 UTC
I see this hasn't really been addressed.  For me, the OOo WYSIWYG HTML editing
(in general) is not optimal.  When I say HTML editor, I mean *HTML* editor, not
"word processor that exports to HTML".  I guess this isn't what OOo is designed
for, although with a few minor enhancements it could be made much more HTML

Note:  For the last 10 years almost my "standard" has been Claris Home Page.  It
was quite simple to use, and not extraordinarily full featured, but it was a
real WYSIWYG HTML editor, not a word processor.  I liked that.
Comment 4 jasonspiro 2009-08-15 00:42:42 UTC
I have verified that this issue is still present in version DEV300m53 (Build:9412).

joeclarkia, thanks for your comments, but it's better to put general comments
like that in the mailing lists instead of here.  We try to use the issue tracker
to talk about individual issues, not about general ideas for improving OOO.
Comment 5 bettina.haberer 2010-05-21 14:57:39 UTC
To grep the issues easier via "requirements" I put the issues currently lying on
my owner to the owner "requirements".