Issue 2527 - msvcp60.dll Missing
Summary: msvcp60.dll Missing
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Installation
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: PC Windows 95
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@installation
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 2308
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2001-12-13 05:57 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:26 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2001-12-13 05:57:21 UTC 
I downloaded 641b for Windows.

On attempting to install I was informed of a missing dll file (msvcp60.dll).

Had to find it on the Net.

Could some part of the the installation install this file (and any other 
requried files) if it's required.
Comment 1 Olaf Felka 2001-12-13 09:33:55 UTC 
I remember this problem in src638* on Win95 with this C++ runtime
library. Any idea 
why this occurs in 641b, could this occure in 641c also?
Comment 2 hennes.rohling 2001-12-13 10:59:59 UTC 
The old problem with the stlport appears again. I thought we managed this.
Comment 3 hjs 2001-12-14 15:02:17 UTC 
it look like a timing problem of fix/build/pack process. it's fixed in
the german version but still appears in the english installation set.
look for a patch in stlport containing "_NTSDK"...
Comment 4 Unknown 2001-12-14 16:08:46 UTC 
I see the patch which adds _NTSDK to the EXTRA_COMMON_FLAGS 
in stlport. And it was successfully applied. 
What is this going to mean?
Comment 5 stx123 2001-12-19 17:48:04 UTC 
Ause, Armin, has this been clarified?
Is the latest 641 (OO641C) msvcp60 clean?
Comment 6 Unknown 2001-12-20 09:54:09 UTC 
Ause asked me to check weather I have such a dll on my windows 
machine. I found out that I have not, but OOo installs fine without 
complaining. Ause, do you have any other idea what could have 
caused this problem?
Comment 7 stx123 2002-03-12 18:00:41 UTC 
Adrian, which Windows version (Win95, Win98, WinME, WinNT, Win2K) are 
you using?
Armin/Ause, is this still an open issue?
Comment 8 Unknown 2002-03-12 18:04:13 UTC 
Ause,  can you comment on this?
Comment 9 hjs 2002-03-13 11:54:48 UTC 
from my side this issue is regarded fixed since oct. 2001. if for any
reason the patch process for stlport on windows fails, it will popup
again.
it can easiely be checked with a dependency tool (e.g. depends.exe
from the mstoolkit) if the stlport of the used build requires the ms
c++ runtime.
Comment 10 stx123 2002-03-13 22:07:39 UTC 
Adrain answered:
I have Win-95b with USB & DirectX 7, plus a couple of patches re.
y2k, networking update & winsock2 update.

Adrian, could you please put additional comments in this issue (not 
using direct email).
So, we'll (Armin?) check in the upcoming OOo 1.0 Release candidate.
Adrian, would you give the next release a try?
Comment 11 Unknown 2002-04-11 11:52:28 UTC 
Ause ensured in the 641d release that the patching works 
in stlport. This should have solved this problem.
Adrian, can you confirm this?
Comment 12 stx123 2002-04-15 16:29:27 UTC 
Armin, please resolve/fixed.
Adrian, please reopen, if you still have problems with 641d.
Comment 13 Unknown 2002-04-15 16:51:23 UTC 
resolved fixed
Comment 14 michael.bemmer 2003-03-16 20:10:32 UTC 
As discussed with Armin, he thought these bug were closed, he sees all of them
as verified.
Comment 15 michael.bemmer 2003-03-16 20:14:11 UTC 
As discussed with Armin, he thought these bug were closed, he sees all of them
as verified.