Issue 25510 - Remove all references to MAC in the code
Summary: Remove all references to MAC in the code
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 64217
Alias: None
Product: porting
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: Mac All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: AOO Later
Assignee: pavel
QA Contact: issues@porting
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 72366
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-02-15 19:47 UTC by fa
Modified: 2006-12-13 19:15 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: PATCH
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
preliminary patches (72.36 KB, application/x-compressed)
2004-02-24 14:01 UTC, fa
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description fa 2004-02-15 19:47:54 UTC
Since MAC refers to Mac OS 7 - 9, and no port exists, these patches remove MAC from the code and 
makefiles.  Mac OS X is defined as MACOSX, so the two do not mix and any code inside MAC statements 
hasn't been built in years and never will be.
Comment 1 Martin Hollmichel 2004-02-16 09:56:08 UTC
set target and reassign.
Comment 2 fa 2004-02-19 15:01:40 UTC
Modules required for cws:

basctl
basic
comphelper
connectivity
dbaccess
desktop
framework
goodies
i18npool
idl
rsc
sal
sc
sd
setup2
sfx2
so3
solenv
sot
starmath
stoc
svtools
svx
sw
tools
transex3
vcl
vos
Comment 3 fa 2004-02-20 14:27:42 UTC
fa->hr:  could you please create a CWS for this, based off of 680?  Please re-assign back to me for 
commits and completion when the CWS has been created.  Thanks!
Comment 4 jens-heiner.rechtien 2004-02-20 17:13:26 UTC
HR->FA: I've created a CWS called ooomaccleanup and added all the modules you
requested. Please tell me if you need more modules added.

Reassigned to Dan.
Comment 5 fa 2004-02-24 14:01:50 UTC
Created attachment 13404 [details]
preliminary patches
Comment 6 foskey 2004-12-22 21:25:16 UTC
I am pretty sure this was all cleaned up and committed.  Can someone from the
MAC port please provide a status.
Comment 7 fa 2005-01-04 15:30:04 UTC
AFAIK, the CWS hasn't been integrated and it will need to be resynced (it was
created a very long time ago).  Please leave open and active.
Comment 8 stx123 2005-02-18 16:31:56 UTC
Greetigs Dan, are you going to work on this issue in the 2.0 timeframe Martin 
described on releases@ooo?
http://development.openoffice.org/releases/OpenOffice_org_2_x.html
If not I would like to change the target milestone.
Thanks, Stefan
Comment 9 pavel 2005-03-03 12:41:38 UTC
change target to OOoLater
Comment 10 pavel 2006-02-07 08:22:55 UTC
I'll investigate.
Comment 11 eric.bachard 2006-05-19 19:15:08 UTC
64217 and 25510 are duplicated, but since fa doesn't follow anymore what happens, I'll take over 25510



*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 64217 ***
Comment 12 pavel 2006-05-19 22:58:13 UTC
.