Issue 26534 - Dialog boxes - OpenOffice.org Applications
Summary: Dialog boxes - OpenOffice.org Applications
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 76250
Alias: None
Product: ui
Classification: Code
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: 680m77
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-03-16 09:44 UTC by aparan
Modified: 2021-08-16 22:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description aparan 2004-03-16 09:44:15 UTC
I feel that the dialog boxes of OpenOffice.org applications are a little bit 
big.  They need a bit of pruning.  Almost all of them could be made compact.

Eg. Writer:: Format > Numbering /Bullets and Format > Character Dialog boxes

They have extra number of tabs, which could assimilated into a single tab-page 
and thereby save some space and have a compact look.
Comment 1 mci 2004-03-29 13:56:34 UTC
reassigned to bh
Comment 2 aparan 2005-02-08 05:34:25 UTC
We are nearing the release of OO.o 2.0, so I don't think this is anything for
this release.  

As far as the UI and dialogs in most of the applications in OO.o suite is
concerned, a lot of rework is being going one.  Also, I came across a proposal
by CJ about adopting new measurements for OO.o 2.0 dialogs, with some
screenshots of the proposed dialog.  I believe that was wonderful, but i am
saddened by the fact that these proposals are not implemented in full.  I
believe as far as common users is concerned the looks of the UI also makes a
difference. A related issue 42227 about the menus may also be seen.
Comment 3 bettina.haberer 2010-05-21 15:09:17 UTC
To grep the issues easier via "requirements" I put the issues currently lying on
my owner to the owner "requirements". 
Comment 4 oooforum (fr) 2021-08-16 07:47:40 UTC
See meta

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 76250 ***