Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 29458
Copy and paste of slide in Slides View does not work
Last modified: 2006-01-04 19:04:49 UTC
1. Load attached test2.sxi 2. Enter Slides View 3. Select Slide #1 4. Copy (ctrl-c) 5. Paste (ctrl-v) 6. Copy is not not identical to Slide #1
Created attachment 15431 [details] Test case
Created attachment 15432 [details] Shows how the copy visibly differ from the original
NOTE!!! It does work sometimes! With this smaller test case, it appears to fail all the time, but in my larger presentation, it sometimes works. Øyvind
Reassigned to Christian.
Try this: - Copy (ctrl-v) - Paste e.g. 50 copies. (hold down ctrl-v). - See a mix of correct and incorrect copies. Øyvind
set to new and change the target.
I can reproduce the bug. PLease have a look.
Accepted.
The old slides view will be replaced by the new slide sorter of the Multi Pane GUI. Therefore, I set the type to FEATURE.
In my experience, copying a slide from one presentation to another does not copy the needed styles (i.e. styles that are used in the slide that is being copied). I've reproduced this using drag and drop in the slide view, and using Insert->File in the drawing view. Thus, the bug is: needed styles do not get copied along with slide when the slide is copied.
Yes, it is a bug. And it is still reproducable in SRC680 m48.
I can not reproduce the problem of the copy not looking like the original slide in milestone m51. However, the insertion position is wrong. We seem to have an problem with our internal indexes and insert at position 2*i when i is the correct index (one behind the last selected slide.)
Fixed the wrong insertion position in sd/source/ui/slidesorter/controller/SlsClippboard.cxx:DoPaste(). Here different types of index (2*+1 and straight) were mixed.
Step 1/3 of sending issue to QA.
Step 2/3 of sending issue to QA.
Step 3/3 of sending issue to QA.
Verifeid in cws imperess21 on Sols, Lin, Win.
I can't test the issue of integration because of issue 37867. Issue 37867 is fixed in the next version. I test this issue of integration in the next version.
Integrated in src680m65 There is a similar in src680m65. I write a new issue for the new bug.
*** Issue 59308 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***